Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768363›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Multicenter Trial of [

Val J Lowe, Fenghai Duan, Rathan M Subramaniam, JoRean D Sicks, Justin Romanoff, Twyla Bartel, Jian Q Michael Yu, Brian Nussenbaum, Jeremy Richmon, Charles D Arnold and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00983697 (A Multicenter Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and Its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00983697 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and Its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican College of Radiology Imaging NetworkRan2010 to 2021Enrolled292ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmstherapeutic conventional surgery, fludeoxyglucose F 18
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic and Economic Evaluation of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Role ofCancers · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Head and neck MRI-based T stage and [European radiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating lymph node status in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Val J Lowe1 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Fenghai Duan2 Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Rathan M Subramaniam3 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
JoRean D Sicks2 Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Justin Romanoff2 Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Twyla Bartel4 Global Advanced Imaging, Little Rock, AR.
Jian Q Michael Yu5 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Brian Nussenbaum6 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Jeremy Richmon7 Massachusetts Eye and Ear Hospital, Boston, MA.
Charles D Arnold8 University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK.
David Cognetti9 Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Brendan C Stack10 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Brown University · USAdvanced Imaging Research (United States) · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOklahoma City University · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

ARRA - ADOPT New Technologies for RDC/CDMSU01CA080098 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI SCHNALL, MITCHELL D. · 1999 to 2011
$182.7M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
BIOSTATISTICS DATA MANAGEMENT CENTER FOR ACROINU01CA079778 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GATSONIS, CONSTANTINE A. · 1999 to 2011
$48.6M
UT Southwestern NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) LAPS - Supplemental Funds YR4UG1CA233302 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Eric Gerber · 2019 to 2026
$6.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA079778NCI NIH HHS U01 CA080098NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for the clinically N0 neck on the basis of neck dissection.

methodsParticipants with newly diagnosed, first-time, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and at least one clinically N0 neck side for which dissection was planned were included. A total of 287 participants were prospectively enrolled from 23 American College of Radiology Imaging Network-qualified institutions. PET/CT was compared with findings at neck dissection.

resultsPET/CT scans and pathology findings were available for 270 N0 neck sides from 212 participants. For visual assessment, the NPV specific to the clinical-N0 sides was 0.868 (95% CI, 0.803 to 0.925). For dichotomized maximum standardized uptake value, the NPVs specific to the nodal basins were 0.940 (95% CI, 0.928 to 0.952) and 0.937 (95% CI, 0.925 to 0.949) at prespecified cutoffs of 2.5 and 3.5, respectively. The optimal cutoff maximum standardized uptake value was determined to be 1.8, with an NPV of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.930 to 0.953). The PET/CT-informed surgical treatment plan was changed in 51 of 237 participants (22%) compared with the PET/CT-blinded surgical plan. In 34 participants (14%), this led to planned dissection of additional nodal levels. In 12 participants (5%), this led to fewer planned dissected nodal levels. Negative PET/CT scans in N0 necks was true negative in 87% and false negative in 13%.

conclusion[

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeckNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRadiologyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID30768363
PMCPMC6638599
OpenAlexW2914557752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.