Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768194›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Use of Prescription Opioids and Initiation of Fatal 2-Vehicle Crashes.

Stanford Chihuri, Guohua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of state opioid prescribing laws on rates of fatal crashes in the USA.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trends in Prescription Opioid Use in Motor Vehicle Crash Injuries in the United States: 2014-2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Do opioid prescriptions lead to fatal car crashes?American journal of health economics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stanford ChihuriCenter for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Guohua LiCenter for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

Columbia Injury Control Research CenterR49CE002096 · CE · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LI, GUOHUA · 2012 to 2018
$5.5M
NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE002096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The prevalence of prescription opioids detected in fatally injured drivers has increased markedly in the past 2 decades in the United States. It is unclear whether driver use of prescription opioids plays a role in fatal crash causation. Objective: To assess the association between driver use of prescription opioids and the risk of being culpable of crash initiation in fatal 2-vehicle crashes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pair-matched study was based on data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System for drivers involved in fatal 2-vehicle crashes on US public roads between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2016. Data analysis was conducted from December 8, 2017, to December 7, 2018. Exposures: Testing positive for prescription opioids compared with testing negative, and blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) based on toxicological testing results. Main Outcomes and Measures: Culpability of crash initiation and adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs. Results: A total of 36 642 drivers involved in 18 321 fatal 2-vehicle crashes were included. The most common driving error leading to fatal 2-vehicle crashes was failure to keep in lane (7535 [41%]). Drivers culpable of initiating the crashes were more likely than their nonculpable counterparts to test positive for prescription opioids (918 [5.0%] vs 549 [3.0%]; P < .001), alcohol (BAC ≥0.01 g/dL, 5258 [28.7%] vs 1815 [9.9%]; P < .001), and both substances (1.0% vs 0.3%, P < .001). The adjusted odds ratio of crash initiation was 2.18 (95% CI, 1.91-2.48) for drivers testing positive for prescription opioids compared with drivers testing negative, and increased with BACs (BAC 0.01-0.07 g/dL: adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.75-2.22; BAC ≥0.08 g/dL: adjusted odds ratio, 8.20; 95% CI, 7.42-9.07; compared with BAC <0.01 g/dL). There was no significant interaction effect on crash initiation between prescription opioid use and alcohol use. Conclusions and Relevance: Driver use of prescription opioids was associated with initiation of 2-vehicle crashes, independent of alcohol use. Clinicians should take into consideration the adverse effect of opioid analgesics on driving safety while prescribing these medications and counseling patients.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID30768194
PMCPMC6484610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.