Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768139›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Molecular and Functional Evolution at the Odorant Receptor Or22 Locus in Drosophila melanogaster.

Katherine H Shaw, Travis K Johnson, Alisha Anderson, Marien de Bruyne, Coral G Warr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Receptor sequence divergence, gain, loss, duplication, and neofunctionalization drive olfactory adaptation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Genomic plasticity drives olfactory adaptation in a pest fly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms of Variability Underlying Odor-Guided Locomotion.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Natural variation at theOpen biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of olfactory circuits in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine H ShawSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Travis K JohnsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Alisha AndersonEcosystems Sciences, CSIRO, Black Mountain, ACT, Australia.
Marien de BruyneSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Coral G WarrSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect odorant receptor (Or) genes determine the responses of sensory neurons that mediate critical behaviors. The Drosophila melanogaster Or22 locus represents an interesting example of molecular evolution, with high levels of sequence divergence and copy number variation between D. melanogaster and other Drosophila species, and a corresponding high level of variability in the responses of the neuron it controls, ab3A. However, the link between Or22 molecular and functional diversity has not been established. Here, we show that several naturally occurring Or22 variants generate major shifts in neuronal response properties. We determine the molecular changes that underpin these response shifts, one of which represents a chimeric gene variant previously suggested to be under natural selection. In addition, we show that several alternative molecular genetic mechanisms have evolved for ensuring that where there is more than one gene copy at this locus, only one functional receptor is generated. Our data thus provide a causal link between the striking levels of phenotypic neuronal response variation found in natural populations of D. melanogaster and genetic variation at the Or22 locus. Since neuronal responses govern animal behavior, we predict that Or22 may be a key player in underlying one or more olfactory-driven behaviors of significant adaptive importance.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenetic VariationInsect ProteinsMaleOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPhenotypeReceptors, OdorantDrosophila ProteinsInsect ProteinsOR22a protein, DrosophilaReceptors, Odorantchimeric geneDrosophila melanogasternatural variantsodorant receptorolfaction

Identifiers

PMID30768139
PMCPMC6502086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.