Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767961›Full record

Trial reportOncology nursing forum2019

Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Improve Nurses' Hazardous Drug Handling

Christopher R Friese, James Yang, Kari Mendelsohn-Victor, Marjorie McCullagh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncology nursing forum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02283164 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Oncology Nurses' Protective Equipment Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02283164 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Oncology Nurses' Protective Equipment Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2015 to 2019Enrolled396ConditionsOccupational Health, Hazardous Material HandlingArmsHazardous materials online education and study feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher R FrieseUniversity of Michigan.
James YangUniversity of Michigan.
Kari Mendelsohn-VictorUniversity of Michigan.
Marjorie McCullaghUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Oncology Nurses' Protective Equipment UseR01OH010582 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FRIESE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
NIH HHS 1 R01 OH 010582-01NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010582NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate whether a web-based educational intervention improved personal protective equipment (PPE) use among oncology nurses who handle hazardous drugs. SAMPLE &

settingFrom 2015 to 2017, the authors partnered with 12 ambulatory oncology settings in the United States to enroll 396 nurses, 257 of whom completed baseline and primary endpoint surveys. METHODS & VARIABLES: In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 136 nurses in control settings received a one-hour educational module on PPE use with quarterly reminders, and 121 nurses in treatment settings received the control intervention plus tailored messages to address perceived barriers and quarterly data gathered on hazardous drug spills across all study settings. The primary outcome was nurse-reported PPE use.

resultsControl and intervention sites had suboptimal PPE use before and after the intervention. No significant differences were observed in PPE use knowledge or perceived barriers. Participants reported high satisfaction with the study experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Hazardous drug exposure confers notable health risks to healthcare workers. To improve hazardous drug handling, occupational healthcare workers, health systems, and professional organizations should consider coordinated efforts to implement policy and practice changes.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGuideline AdherenceHazardous SubstancesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalOccupational ExposureSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesHazardous Substanceshazardous drugsoccupational exposurepersonal protective equipment

Identifiers

PMID30767961
PMCPMC6425480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.