Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767908›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2019

Health Care and Cybersecurity: Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature.

Mohammad S Jalali, Sabina Razak, William Gordon, Eric Perakslis, Stuart Madnick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. EARS to cyber incidents in health care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad S JalaliMGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-2732
Sabina RazakSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4622-2771
William GordonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6975-3225
Eric PerakslisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2395-810X
Stuart MadnickSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9240-2573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, clinical care has become globally dependent on information technology. The cybersecurity of health care information systems is now an essential component of safe, reliable, and effective health care delivery.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to provide an overview of the literature at the intersection of cybersecurity and health care delivery.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science for English-language peer-reviewed articles. We carried out chronological analysis, domain clustering analysis, and text analysis of the included articles to generate a high-level concept map composed of specific words and the connections between them.

resultsOur final sample included 472 English-language journal articles. Our review results revealed that majority of the articles were focused on technology: Technology-focused articles made up more than half of all the clusters, whereas managerial articles accounted for only 32% of all clusters. This finding suggests that nontechnological variables (human-based and organizational aspects, strategy, and management) may be understudied. In addition, Software Development Security, Business Continuity, and Disaster Recovery Planning each accounted for 3% of the studied articles. Our results also showed that publications on Physical Security account for only 1% of the literature, and research in this area is lacking. Cyber vulnerabilities are not all digital; many physical threats contribute to breaches and potentially affect the physical safety of patients.

conclusionsOur results revealed an overall increase in research on cybersecurity and identified major gaps and opportunities for future work.

Indexed as

BibliometricsComputer SecurityDelivery of Health CareHumansbibliometric reviewcybersecurityhealth careliterature analysistext mining

Identifiers

PMID30767908
PMCPMC6396074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.