ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2018
Non-optimal perceptual decision in human navigation.
Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Test-retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: Accuracy, variability, and cue weighting.Spatial cognition and computation · 2025Article
- Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effects of older age on visual and self-motion sensory cue integration in navigation.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Not seeing the forest for the trees: combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We highlight that optimal cue combination does not represent a general principle of cue interaction during navigation, extending Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) summary of nonoptimal perceptual decisions to the navigation domain. However, we argue that the term "suboptimality" does not capture the way visual and nonvisual cues interact in navigational decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30767832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.