Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767422›Full record

Trial reportTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2019

Effect of a maternal and newborn health system quality improvement project on the use of facilities for childbirth: a cluster-randomised study in rural Tanzania.

Elysia Larson, Anna D Gage, Godfrey M Mbaruku, Redempta Mbatia, Sebastien Haneuse, Margaret E Kruk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elysia LarsonDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Anna D GageDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Godfrey M MbarukuIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Redempta MbatiaTanzania Health Promotion Support, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sebastien HaneuseDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Margaret E KrukDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Improving Maternal and Newborn Health Using the HIV/AIDS Program Platform in TanzR01AI093182 · NIAID · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI KRUK, MARGARET E. · 2011 to 2015
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReduction in maternal and newborn mortality requires that women deliver in high quality health facilities. However, many facilities provide sub-optimal quality of care, which may be a reason for less than universal facility utilisation. We assessed the impact of a quality improvement project on facility utilisation for childbirth.

methodsIn this cluster-randomised experiment in four rural districts in Tanzania, 12 primary care clinics and their catchment areas received a quality improvement intervention consisting of in-service training, mentoring and supportive supervision, infrastructure support, and peer outreach, while 12 facilities and their catchment areas functioned as controls. We conducted a census of all deliveries within the catchment area and used difference-in-differences analysis to determine the intervention's effect on facility utilisation for childbirth. We conducted a secondary analysis of utilisation among women whose prior delivery was at home. We further investigated mechanisms for increased facility utilisation.

resultsThe intervention led to an increase in facility births of 6.7 percentage points from a baseline of 72% (95% Confidence Interval: 0.6, 12.8). The intervention increased facility delivery among women with past home deliveries by 18.3 percentage points (95% CI: 10.1, 26.6). Antenatal quality increased in intervention facilities with providers performing an additional 0.5 actions across the full population and 0.8 actions for the home delivery subgroup.

conclusionsWe attribute the increased use of facilities to better antenatal quality. This increased utilisation would lead to lower maternal mortality only in the presence of improvement in care quality.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHealth FacilitiesMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal Mortalitycluster-randomised controlled trialessai contrôlé randomisé en grappesevaluationévaluationmaternal and newborn healthqualitéqualitysanté maternelle et néonataleTanzaniaTanzanieutilisation

Identifiers

PMID30767422
PMCPMC6499631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.