Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767342›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2019

Paediatric safety signals identified in VigiBase: Methods and results from Uppsala Monitoring Centre.

Kristina Star, Lovisa Sandberg, Tomas Bergvall, Imti Choonara, Pia Caduff-Janosa, I Ralph Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adverse cardiovascular events in patients treated with mogamulizumab.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristina StarResearch Section, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-8609
Lovisa SandbergResearch Section, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tomas BergvallResearch Section, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Imti ChoonaraDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Pia Caduff-JanosaResearch Section, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
I Ralph EdwardsResearch Section, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to uncover previously unrecognised risks of medicines in paediatric pharmacovigilance reports and thereby advance a safer use of medicines in paediatrics.

methodsIndividual case safety reports (ICSRs) with ages less than 18 years were retrieved from VigiBase, the World Health Organization (WHO) global database of ICSRs, in September 2014. The reports were grouped according to the following age spans: 0 to 27 days; 28 days to 23 months; 2 to 11 years; and 12 to 17 years. vigiRank, a data-driven predictive model for emerging safety signals, was used to prioritise the list of drug events by age groups. The list was manually assessed, and potential signals were identified to undergo in-depth assessment to determine whether a signal should be communicated.

resultsA total of 472 drug-event pairs by paediatric age groups were the subject of an initial manual assessment. Twenty-seven drug events from the two older age groups were classified as potential signals. An in-depth assessment resulted in eight signals, of which one concerned harm in connection with off-label use of dextromethorphan and another with accidental overdose of olanzapine by young children, and the remaining signals referred to potentially new causal associations for atomoxetine (two signals), temozolamide, deferasirox, levetiracetam, and desloratadine that could be relevant also for adults.

conclusionsClinically relevant signals were uncovered in VigiBase by using vigiRank applied to paediatric age groups. Further refinement of the methodology is needed to identify signals in reports with ages under 2 years and to capture signals specific to the paediatric population as a risk group.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInfantProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingSwedenWorld Health Organizationadverse drug reaction reporting systemsindividual case safety reportspaediatricspharmacoepidemiologypharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID30767342
PMCPMC6594230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.