Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767188›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2019

Comparison of the Bile Reflux Frequency in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Cohort Study.

Behrouz Keleidari, Mohsen Mahmoudieh, Amir Hosein Davarpanah Jazi, Hamid Melali, Farid Nasr Esfahani, Mohammad Minakari, Mojgan Mokhtari

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Behrouz KeleidariMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohsen MahmoudiehMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Mahmoudieh@med.mui.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-779X
Amir Hosein Davarpanah JaziMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hamid MelaliMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Farid Nasr EsfahaniMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad MinakariDepartment of Gastroenterology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mojgan MokhtariDepartment of Pathology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the most acceptable procedures in bariatric surgery is laparoscopic gastric bypass. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a common technique used in bariatric surgery. Recently, one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been suggested as a simple, fast, and effective technique for obesity treatment. This study aims to compare the frequency of histologically proven bile reflux in OAGB and RYGB among patients with morbid obesity.

methodsThis prospective cohort study was performed from 2015 to 2017 in the Department of Bariatric Surgery of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Patients who had undergone RYGB or OAGB surgery were enrolled. Patients who had undergone revisional surgery were excluded. Data on demographics, symptoms, fasting blood sugar, lipid profile, endoscopic, and histologic findings (based on the Sydney bile reflux index) of bile reflux and postoperative complications were collected and compared for the two techniques.

resultsA total of 122 obese patients (22 males) who had undergone RYGB or OAGB surgery were included. The Sydney bile reflux index showed no statistically significant difference between RYGB and OAGB groups. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found in the self-reported history of bile reflux-related symptoms, bile reflux markers in esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and postoperative complications between groups.

conclusionsOAGB and RYGB appear to be equal with respect to postoperative complications, bile reflux frequency, bile reflux index, and the Sydney system score.

Indexed as

AdultBile RefluxFemaleGastric BypassHumansIranLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSelf ReportTreatment OutcomeBile refluxMorbid obesityOmega gastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypassRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID30767188
OpenAlexW2912675001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.