Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767145›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2019

Social learning about construction behaviour via an artefact.

Alexis J Breen, Clémence C Bonneaud, Susan D Healy, Lauren M Guillette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Demonstrating the reproductive consequences of cognition: learning from experience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Bird nest building: visions for the future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis J BreenSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. ab297@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-0920
Clémence C BonneaudDepartment of Lettres, Sciences Humaines et des Sociétés, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Susan D HealySchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK.
Lauren M GuilletteSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. guillett@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8777-6543

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M013944/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One source of public information may be the enduring products of others' behaviour, such as discarded tools or vacated nests. Here, we examined whether observation of a nest affects the material captive zebra finch males prefer when they construct their first nest. It does: for first-time nest construction, males that viewed only an empty cage preferred the colour of material each initially favoured but those males that had observed a pre-built nest of material of their non-preferred colour lost their material-colour preference altogether. Additionally, half of the males that viewed a nest were tested in an environment (the laboratory) different to that in which they were reared (an outdoor aviary). We had expected the aviary-reared (versus laboratory-reared) males would be more uncertain, and thus more likely to select material for their first nest that matched in colour to the colour of the 'demonstrated' nest-but this was not the case. The aviary-reared males did, however, tend to touch first the demonstrated colour of material more than did the laboratory-reared males. Together these results show that both observation of a nest and a change in environment can influence the material choices of novice builders. For naïve animal builders, then, construction artefacts can be information resources for learning about potential construction material.

Indexed as

FinchesNesting BehaviorSocial LearningAnimalsColorLearningMaleAnimal buildingAnimal constructionConstruction artefactsMaterial preferenceNest constructionSocial learningZebra finch

Identifiers

PMID30767145
PMCPMC6507502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.