ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019
Predicting tachycardia as a surrogate for instability in the intensive care unit.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Review
- HeLP-BAG score: a novel data-driven scoring system for predicting post-operative 30-day mortality using 24-hour preoperative data.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Continuous Evaluation Frameworks for Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical Machine Learning Models.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Current Perspectives on the Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Anesthesiology clinics · 2025Review
- Enhancing Infection Control in ICUS Through AI: A Literature Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- A transformer-based diffusion probabilistic model for heart rate and blood pressure forecasting in Intensive Care Unit.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Engaging Multidisciplinary Clinical Users in the Design of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Graphical User Interface for Intensive Care Unit Instability Decision Support.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Continuous Data-Driven Monitoring in Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Clinical Deterioration Model Development.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence for clinical decision support for monitoring patients in cardiovascular ICUs: A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Understanding basic principles of Artificial Intelligence: a practical guide for intensivists.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Review
- Intelligent Clinical Decision Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting anesthetic infusion events using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care: Adding A Handy Tool to Our Armamentarium.Cureus · 2021Review
- TOP-Net Prediction Model Using Bidirectional Long Short-term Memory and Medical-Grade Wearable Multisensor System for Tachycardia Onset: Algorithm Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Machine Learning-Based Early Warning Systems for Clinical Deterioration: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tachycardia is a strong though non-specific marker of cardiovascular stress that proceeds hemodynamic instability. We designed a predictive model of tachycardia using multi-granular intensive care unit (ICU) data by creating a risk score and dynamic trajectory. A subset of clinical and numerical signals were extracted from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II database. A tachycardia episode was defined as heart rate ≥ 130/min lasting for ≥ 5 min, with ≥ 10% density. Regularized logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) classifiers were trained to create a risk score for upcoming tachycardia. Three different risk score models were compared for tachycardia and control (non-tachycardia) groups. Risk trajectory was generated from time windows moving away at 1 min increments from the tachycardia episode. Trajectories were computed over 3 hours leading up to the episode for three different models. From 2809 subjects, 787 tachycardia episodes and 707 control periods were identified. Patients with tachycardia had increased vasopressor support, longer ICU stay, and increased ICU mortality than controls. In model evaluation, RF was slightly superior to LR, which accuracy ranged from 0.847 to 0.782, with area under the curve from 0.921 to 0.842. Risk trajectory analysis showed average risks for tachycardia group evolved to 0.78 prior to the tachycardia episodes, while control group risks remained < 0.3. Among the three models, the internal control model demonstrated evolving trajectory approximately 75 min before tachycardia episode. Clinically relevant tachycardia episodes can be predicted from vital sign time series using machine learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.