Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767124›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2019

Reassessing the Safety Profile of Lesinurad in Combination with Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor Therapy.

Fernando Perez-Ruiz, Tim L Jansen, Anne-Kathrin Tausche, Pascal Richette, Frédéric Lioté, Alexander K So, Austin Stack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Fernando Perez-RuizRheumatology Division, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute and Medicine Department, Medicine and Nursery School, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain. fernando.perezruiz@osakidetza.eus.
Tim L JansenDepartment of Rheumatology, VieCuri MC, Teglseweg 210, 9012 BL, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Anne-Kathrin TauscheDepartment of Rheumatology, University Clinic "Carl Gustav Carus" at the Technical University, Dressden, Germany.
Pascal RichetteRheumatology Department and Inserm URM 1132, Centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisière (AP-HP) and Université Paris Diderot, USPC, Paris, France.
Frédéric LiotéRheumatology Department and Inserm URM 1132, Centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisière (AP-HP) and Université Paris Diderot, USPC, Paris, France.
Alexander K SoUniversity of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Austin StackNephrology Division, University Hospital Limerick, Graduate Entry Medical School, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
BioCruces Health research Institute · ESInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Limerick · IEVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

International Association for Media and Communication Research (US) 1-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rate of adverse renal events has been shown to be higher in patients treated with lesinurad plus a xanthine-oxidase inhibitor (XOI) than in patients treated only with a XOI. We reassessed the risks for various adverse renal events from a different perspective and devised a hypothesis to explain the results.

methodsWe used data from phase 3 trials that were publicly available from the full prescribing information document and estimated the relative risk and the number needed to treat for increased serum creatinine (sCri), renal failure, and renal lithiasis. We examined these risks for each treatment group and the risks stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

resultsOverall, the relative risk for sCri was > 1.0 with the 400 mg/day dose of lesinurad and higher with the 200 mg/day dose, but it was < 1.0 for both lithiasis and renal failure with the 200 mg/day dose. The relative risk was only statistically significant for sCri with the highest dose of lesinurad. When results stratified by eGFR were considered, the rates of adverse events increased with declining renal function, but the relative risks decreased in parallel, as the rate of adverse events increased much more in the placebo arm than in the active arm (200 mg/day dose). Indeed, the relative risk was only significant for the highest dose of lesinurad in patients with normal eGFR.

conclusionThe rate of sCri events was higher in patients treated with both lesinurad and a XOI rather than a XOI alone. This rate was found to increase with decreasing eGFR, but as it does in for both active and placebo arms the relative risk is not different from that observed in the placebo arms in the labeled 200 mg/day dose. This may be explained by pathophysiological changes that develop in chronic kidney disease.

Indexed as

Creatinine increaseGoutLesinuradRelative riskRenal failureRenal lithiasisSafety

Identifiers

PMID30767124
PMCPMC6393267
OpenAlexW2914089534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.