Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767114›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2019

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers: a Meta-Analysis Including 3564 Patients.

Huining Liu, Qifan Yin, Guang Yang, Peng Qie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huining LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Provincal General Hospital, 348,West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China. liuhuining1972@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-7976
Qifan YinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Provincal General Hospital, 348,West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Guang YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Provincal General Hospital, 348,West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Peng QieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Provincal General Hospital, 348,West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Hebei General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection is the most effective treatment for early stage lung adenocarcinoma. However, the rate of 5-year postoperative recurrence reaches 30%, Spread Through Air Spaces(STAS) is a recently described novel invasive pattern of lung cancer, According to the 2015 WHO classification. STAS is defined as"micropapillary clusters, solid nests, or single cells spreading within air spaces beyond the edge of the main tumor, However, the prognostic role of STAS in lung cancer is not known, The aim of the current study is to evaluate the association between STAS and clinical outcome of lung cancer patients after surgical resection through a meta-analysis. Systematic research was conducted using three online databases to search for studies published before August 1, 2018. The 5-year RFS and OS for non-small cell lung cancer patients after surgical resection with or without STAS were compared. The studies were selected according to rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effective measures. Included in our meta-analysis were 12 studies, published from 2015 to 2018, with a total of 3564 patients. Our results clearly depicted that the presence of STAS predicted a worse outcome for 5-year RFS with the combined HR of 1.84(95% CI: 1.59-2.12). Meta-analysis of these 8 studies showed that patients with the presence of STAS were associated with shorter 5-year OS (the pooled HR:1.78, 95% CI: 1.51-2.11). This meta-analysis illuminated that the presence of STAS might be a unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with NSCLC. it should be paid sufficient attention and recorded in pathologic reports, which can indicate treatment choice and prognosis of patients. In future, more studies with well-designed and large-scale are needed to confirm the conclusion.

Indexed as

Blood VesselsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic VesselsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisRisk FactorsMeta-analysisNon-small cell lung cancerPrognosisSpread through air spaces

Identifiers

PMID30767114
OpenAlexW2914836187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.