Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767062›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Assessment of individualized treatment of rectal carcinoma].

F Aigner, A Lorenz, D Öfner, J Pratschke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F AignerChirurgische Klinik, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. felix.aigner@charite.de.
A LorenzUniversitätsklinik für Visceral‑, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.
D ÖfnerUniversitätsklinik für Visceral‑, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.
J PratschkeChirurgische Klinik, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individualized and tailored treatment plays a crucial role in the rating of special operation techniques or certain treatment strategies following defined quality criteria and indicators. Deviations from clearly defined recommendations in guidelines must therefore be justified, documented and evaluated as precisely as possible. The aim of this leading article is to examine the individualized treatment of rectal cancer based on existing evidence and to discuss its role in the light of routinely used treatment algorithms. In addition to a web-based literature search the current German national S3 guidelines on colorectal cancer were also included. In the treatment of cancer in the middle and lower third of the rectum, individual, patient and tumor-related parameters are of decisive importance from the pretreatment stage to the actual surgery up to aftercare and adjuvant therapy to enable interdisciplinary decision making for optimal treatment.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsCombined Modality TherapyDecision MakingHumansRectumChemoradiotherapyInterdisciplinarityMetastasisQuality indicatorsS3 guidelines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.