Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767047›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Bacteriotherapy with Streptococcus salivarius 24SMB and Streptococcus oralis 89a oral spray for children with recurrent streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical study.

Claudio Andaloro, Maria Santagati, Stefania Stefani, Ignazio La Mantia

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Exploiting haem-iron dependence of nontypeableFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. In Vitro Effects ofCells · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudio AndaloroEar, Nose and Throat Unit, Santa Marta e Santa Venera Hospital, Via Caronia, 95024, Acireale, CT, Italy. cla.anda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-6247
Maria SantagatiLabMMAR, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Microbiology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, Catania, Italy.
Stefania StefaniLabMMAR, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Microbiology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, Catania, Italy.
Ignazio La MantiaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, GF Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITHospital de Santa Marta · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGroup A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS) causes a recurrent acute pharyngotonsillitis (RAPT) in children. Moreover, the repeated use of antibiotics contributes to its resistance. However, S. Salivarius 24SMB and S. oralis 89a were effective probiotics in other infections. Thus, we decided to evaluate this combination efficacy compared to placebo in RAPT.

methodsPatients with microbiologically confirmed GABHS were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial. They received the aforementioned combination or placebo as an oral spray. We investigated episodes of frequency and duration, need for antibiotics, school days lost, the treatment impact on life quality, treatment compliance and side effects during a 90-day treatment and a 6-month follow-up.

resultsWe included 41 patients in each group. The mean number of GABHS infection was significantly lower during both study periods for the two groups. However, our treatment group showed a lower rate. Moreover, the probiotic group had a lower mean number and a shorter median duration of GABHS episodes during both study periods than controls. Furthermore, the mean duration of antibiotic treatment was lower in the probiotic group during the 90-day and 6-month follow-up periods. Similarly, patients in the probiotic group showed a significantly lower mean number of absence days from school but higher EQ-VAS score. Indeed, all patients included were compliant to treatment.

conclusionsWe identified potential probiotics, possessing desirable features against GABHS pharyngotonsillitis. Our findings represent the first evidence which throws the light on using these probiotics that can reduce antibiotics use which did not have efficient results regarding recurrence.

Indexed as

Streptococcus agalactiaeStreptococcus oralisStreptococcus salivariusAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological TherapyChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleOral SpraysPharyngitisProbioticsRecurrenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsOral SpraysProbioticsStreptococcus pyogenesStreptococcus salivariusTonsillitis

Identifiers

PMID30767047
OpenAlexW2915066048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.