ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019
A reliable method to avoid contamination during cartilage graft preparation in septorhinoplasty.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Migration and Chondrogenesis of Cells from Minced Nasal Cartilage in Type I Collagen Hydrogel: A Workflow for One-Step Engineering of Injectable Grafts.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study is to determine the risk of contamination in the cartilage graft materials prepared on the swester table and those prepared in a sterile package, and to reveal a more reliable method by performing the microbiological examination of these materials.
methodsCartilages removed from the nasal septum were divided into four pieces. The first part (Sample A) was directly placed into the medium. Sample B was prepared by being crushed in a sterile package. Sample C was prepared on the auxiliary swester table, and Sample D was prepared on the main swester table actively used by surgery team. All samples were transferred in a 1 ml brain heart(BH) liquid medium. From each BH medium, 100 µl culture was performed on blood agar, eosin-methylene blue-lactose-sucrose agar and chocolate agar.
resultsBacterial growth was detected in 2 of the samples A, in 4 of the samples B, in 24 of the samples C, and in 36 of the samples D. The number of patients with bacterial growth in the samples C and/or D despite no growth in the sample B was 35. When the samples A/B and C/D were compared in terms of bacterial growth, a significant difference was found in all matchings (p < 0.001 for all comparisons).
conclusionThese findings showed that preparation of the cartilage grafts on the swester table was extremely risky for microbiological contamination. Arslan and his colleagues suggest that preparing a graft material in a sterile package is extremely simple, cheap, and it also reduces contamination risk significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30767046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.