Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30767035›Full record

SynthesisBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2019

[The new standard operating procedure of the German standing committee on vaccination (STIKO): history, structure, and implementation].

Thomas Harder, Judith Koch, Rüdiger von Kries, Ole Wichmann

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas HarderRobert Koch-Institut, Fachgebiet Impfprävention, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. hardert@rki.de.
Judith KochRobert Koch-Institut, Fachgebiet Impfprävention, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Rüdiger von KriesAbteilung für Epidemiologie im Kindes- und Jugendalter, Institut für Soziale Pädiatrie und Jugendmedizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Ole WichmannRobert Koch-Institut, Fachgebiet Impfprävention, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) develops recommendations on vaccinations and other measures of specific prophylaxis against communicable diseases. Myths, wrong assumptions, and conspiracy theories are able to disturb the implementation of vaccination recommendations. Evidence and transparency of recommendations are needed to rationalize the discussion.In November 2011, STIKO adopted a new standard operating procedure (SOP) for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. Following guidance provided by the SOP, a number of new vaccination recommendations have been developed since 2011. Furthermore, existing recommendations were revised or extended accordingly. This article provides an overview on the methodology of the SOP, describes experiences made so far, and characterizes future challenges.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansMass VaccinationPractice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-based medicineGRADEMeta-analysisSystematic reviewVaccination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.