ArticleBone reports2019
Longitudinal changes in bone mineral density, bone mineral content and bone area at the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal women, and the influence of abdominal aortic calcification.
Article in Bone reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Long-Term Effects of Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments on Bone Mineral Density: 8-Year-Follow-Up Data from Real-World Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Protein compound macrophage migration inhibitory factor for diagnosing postmenopausal osteoporosis.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Characterization and preparation of food-derived peptides on improving osteoporosis: A review.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Fracture risk based on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography measures does not vary with age in older adults-the bone microarchitecture international consortium prospective cohort study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024Article
- Association between serum estradiol levels and abdominal aortic calcification in postmenopausal woman: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Vitamin D Status and Longitudinal Changes in Body Composition in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - A Prospective Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Observational
- Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on health parameters and muscle strength of older women: A longitudinal study.Experimental gerontology · 2022Article
- Genetic Analysis in a Familial Case With High Bone Mineral Density Suggests Additive Effects at Two Loci.JBMR plus · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Longitudinal studies often report that spine bone mineral density (BMD), measured by DXA, is stable in older adults, which has been attributed to osteophyte development and the presence of aortic calcification. A decline in projected spine area as a result of loss of intervertebral disc height might also contribute to higher BMD. We utilised data from 297 postmenopausal women (mean 73 years) who had DXA measurements of the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck 5 years apart, and abdominal aortic calcification scoring from vertebral morphometry. BMD declined by -4.4% at the total hip and -3.9% at the femoral neck (p < 0.001), but did not change at the spine (-0.5%, p = 0.12). In contrast, bone mineral content (BMC) declined by -4.0% at the total hip, -2.5% at the femoral neck and -1.7% at the spine (all p < 0.001). Bone area increased by 0.5% at the hip and 1.6% at the femoral neck but declined by -1.2% at the spine (all p < 0.001). 43% of the cohort had abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) present at baseline. The presence of AAC at baseline was not related to changes in BMD or BMC at the total hip or femoral neck, nor to BMD at the spine. However, women with AAC present had a smaller loss of BMC at the spine than those without (-0.8% versus -2.4%, p = 0.03). AAC score increased more over 5 years among those with AAC at baseline than those without (0.28 versus 0.16, p = 0.036). Thus, the stability of spine BMD is the result of both a loss of projected bone area (as a result of intervertebral disc changes and/or a decrease in projected area of the vertebral bodies) and the effects of aortic calcification. Future clinical trials should consider assessing changes in spine BMC as a more informative index of spine mineral status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.