Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30766846›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer

Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the Regorafenib in Metastatic colorectal cancer - An Indian exploratory analysis study.

Anant Ramaswamy, Vikas Ostwal, Nikhil Pande, Atul Sharma, Shekar Patil, Ravi Thippeswamy, Nikhil Ghadyalpatil, Rakesh Roy, Harish Peshwe, Bhavesh Poladia and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Systemic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Anant RamaswamyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vikas OstwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nikhil PandeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Atul SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. B. R. A IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Shekar PatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, HCG, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ravi ThippeswamyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Nikhil GhadyalpatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yashoda Cancer Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Rakesh RoySaroj Gupta Cancer Centre and Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Harish PeshweDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Healthway Hospitals, Panjim, Goa, India.
Bhavesh PoladiaThangam Cancer Center, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.
Deepan RajamanickamThangam Cancer Center, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bharat RangarajanKovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
P R Neelesh ReddyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Columbia Asia Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vimal PanditaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Ashis MukherjeeDepartment of Oncology, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Aniket ThokeDepartment of Oncology, Sanjeevani CBCC USA Cancer Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Abhijit SarkarSaroj Gupta Cancer Center and Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
C T SatishDepartment of Medical Oncology, HCG, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
H ShashidaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, HCG, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
S D BanavaliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegorafenib is considered a standard of care as third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was based on a computerized clinical data form sent to oncologists across the country for entry of anonymized patient data. The data entry form was conceived and generated by the coordinating center's (Tata Memorial Hospital) gastrointestinal medical oncologists and disseminated through personal contacts at academic conferences as well as through E-mail to various oncologists across India.

resultsA total of 19 physicians contributed data resulting in 80 patients receiving regorafenib who were available for the evaluation of practice patterns. The median age was 55 years (range: 24-75). Majority had received oxaliplatin-based (97.5%), irinotecan-based (87.5%), and targeted therapy (65%), previously. Patients were primarily started on reduced doses of regorafenib upfront (160 mg - 28.8%, 120 mg - 58.8%, and 80 mg - 12.5%). The median duration of treatment (treatment duration) with regorafenib was 3.1 months (range: 0.5-18), while the median progression free survival was 3.48 months (range: 2.6-4.3). Forty-five percent of patients required dose modifications due to toxicities, and the most common were (all grades) hand-foot syndrome (68.8%), fatigue (46.3%), mucositis (37.6%), and diarrhea (31.3%).

conclusionsMajority of physicians in this collaborative study from India used a lower dose of regorafenib at the outset in patients with mCRC. Despite a lower dose, there was a significant requirement for dose reduction. Duration of treatment with regorafenib as an efficacy end point in this study is similar to available data from other regions as it is the side effect profile.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerIndiaregorafenibREgorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer - An Indian eXploratory analysis study

Identifiers

PMID30766846
PMCPMC6348777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.