Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30766617›Full record

ReviewGenes & nutrition2019

Kai Lüersen, Thomas Röder, Gerald Rimbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Time-Restricted Feeding Promotes Longevity and Gut Health Without Fitness Trade-Offs.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Biomolecules · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A comprehensiveFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai Lüersen1Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5812-1196
Thomas Röder2Department of Molecular Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Gerald Rimbach1Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly

Indexed as

DietDiseaseDrosophila melanogasterModel organismPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID30766617
PMCPMC6359822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.