Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30766464›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2018

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause - is the problem solved? State of the art 2018.

Jacek Szymański, Kornelia Zaręba, Grzegorz Jakiel, Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07306611 (Regenerative Treatment of Female Genital Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07306611 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Regenerative Treatment of Female Genital Atrophy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndreiaAntunesRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsVulvo Vaginal AtrophyArmsMesotherapy with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) to vulvovaginal area, Mesotherapy with saline solution, Platelet-Poor Plasma Gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Fractional COLasers in surgery and medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacek Szymański1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Kornelia Zaręba1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz Jakiel1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvovaginal atrophy accompanied by lower urinary tract dysfunction related to low levels of estrogen and androgens is labeled as genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). Although this condition affects most postmenopausal women worldwide, it seems to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. Women should be properly advised to choose an adequate treatment modality to improve their quality of life, sexual relationships and social activity. The aim of this article to is increase knowledge of GSM. The current treatment options, both hormonal and non-hormonal, are reviewed. Topical estrogen therapy still remains the gold standard, but the demand for individually tailored therapy is growing. New treatment modalities are continuously included in clinical practice. They should consider the whole personality of a woman as well as cultural and social factors. Further studies on GSM and on the effectiveness of various treatment options are necessary to achieve this purpose.

Indexed as

androgensestrogenslasermenopauseRF devicesSERMsvulvovaginal atrophy

Identifiers

PMID30766464
PMCPMC6372854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.