Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30766457›Full record

Trial reportPerspectives in health information managemen2019

Electronic Health Record Documentation Times among Emergency Medicine Trainees.

Scott Crawford, Igor Kushner, Radosveta Wells, Stormy Monks

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Which Electronic Health Record System Should We Use? A Systematic Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of Patient Load on the Quality of Electronic Medical Record Documentation.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott CrawfordTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso in El Paso, TX.
Igor KushnerPhoenix Children's Hospital in Phoenix, AZ.
Radosveta WellsTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso in El Paso, TX.
Stormy MonksTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso in El Paso, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians spend a large portion of their time documenting patient encounters using electronic health records (EHRs). Meaningful Use guidelines have made EHR systems widespread, but they have not been shown to save time. This study compared the time required to complete an emergency department note in two different EHR systems for three separate video-recorded standardized simulated patient encounters. The total time needed to complete documentation, including the time to write and order the initial history, physical exam, and diagnostic studies, and the time to provide medical decision making and disposition, were recorded and compared by trainee across training levels. The only significant difference in documentation time was by classification, with second- and third-year trainees being significantly faster in documenting on the Cerner system than fourth-year medical student and first-year trainees (

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultComputers, HandheldDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMedical History TakingPatient SimulationPhysical ExaminationProspective Studiesdocumentationelectronic health recordelectronic medical recordsimulationtimetraining

Identifiers

PMID30766457
PMCPMC6341413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.