Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30766418›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2019

A pictorial key to differentiate the recently detected exotic

Andrea M Egizi, Richard G Robbins, Lorenza Beati, Santiago Nava, Colleen R Vans, James L Occi, Dina M Fonseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Case Report: Retrospective discovery ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. First Report ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Ecological relationships ofParasitology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea M EgiziTick-borne Diseases Laboratory, Monmouth County Mosquito Control Division, 1901 Wayside Road, Tinton Falls, NJ, 07724-4451, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-045X
Richard G RobbinsWalter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, MSC, MRC 534, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD, 20746-2863, USA.
Lorenza BeatiUS National Tick Collection, Institute for Coastal Plain Science, Georgia Southern University, 202 Georgia Avenue, Statesboro, GA, 30460, USA.
Santiago NavaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CC 22, CP 2300 Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Colleen R VansUS National Tick Collection, Institute for Coastal Plain Science, Georgia Southern University, 202 Georgia Avenue, Statesboro, GA, 30460, USA.
James L OcciCenter for Vector Biology, Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 180 Jones Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901-8536, USA.
Dina M FonsecaCenter for Vector Biology, Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 180 Jones Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901-8536, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, only two haemaphysaline species,

Indexed as

Asian longhorned tickdichotomous keyhaemaphysaline faunainvasive speciesscanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30766418
PMCPMC6353864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.