Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30766011›Full record

ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2019

Biosimilars: Considerations for Payers.

James Smeeding, Daniel C Malone, Monica Ramchandani, Bradley Stolshek, Larry Green, Philip Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Public Health Impact of Using Biosimilars, Is Automated Follow up Relevant?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  10. Association Between Filgrastim Biosimilar Availability and Changes in Claim Payments and Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Filgrastim Products.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Update on Biosimilar Insulins: A US Perspective.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James Smeeding
Daniel C Malone
Monica Ramchandani
Bradley Stolshek
Larry Green
Philip Schneider

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating biosimilars requires payers to go beyond cost considerations: safety and efficacy, reliability of supply and logistics, and the impact of state laws on substitution and interchangeability must all be deliberated.

Indexed as

affordability and accessbenefit managementBiosimilarsmanaged carepayerspharmacoeconomics

Identifiers

PMID30766011
PMCPMC6355057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.