Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30765853›Full record

ArticleHeredity2019

Recombination within the Cepaea nemoralis supergene is confounded by incomplete penetrance and epistasis.

Daniel Ramos Gonzalez, Amaia Caro Aramendia, Angus Davison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Ramos GonzalezSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Amaia Caro AramendiaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Angus DavisonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. angus.davison@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-8585

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M008770/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Doctoral Training Partnership award to UoN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the land snail Cepaea nemoralis is one of the most thoroughly investigated colour polymorphic species, there have been few recent studies on the inheritance of the shell traits. Previously, it has been shown that the shell polymorphism is controlled by a series of nine or more loci, of which five make a single 'supergene' containing tightly linked colour and banding loci and more loosely linked pigmentation, spread band and punctate loci. However, one limitation of earlier work was that putative instances of recombination between loci within the supergene were not easily verified. We therefore generated a new set of C. nemoralis crosses that segregate for colour, banding and pigmentation, and several other unlinked shell phenotype loci. The snails were genotyped using a set of RAD-seq-derived loci that flank the supergene, and instances of recombination tested by comparing inferred supergene genotype against RAD-marker genotype. We found no evidence that suspected 'recombinant' individuals are recombinant between loci within the supergene. As point estimates of recombination between both colour/banding, and colour/pigmentation loci are zero, incomplete penetrance and epistasis are a better explanation for the apparent 'recombinant' phenotype of some snail shells. Overall, this work, therefore, shows that the architecture of the supergene may not be as previously supposed. It also provides a resource for fine mapping of the supergene and other major shell phenotype loci.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal ShellsBiological Variation, PopulationEpistasis, GeneticGenotypePenetrancePhenotypePigmentationPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSnails

Identifiers

PMID30765853
PMCPMC6781172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.