Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30765707›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Subcortical electrophysiological activity is detectable with high-density EEG source imaging.

Martin Seeber, Lucia-Manuela Cantonas, Mauritius Hoevels, Thibaut Sesia, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Christoph M Michel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 287 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mapping epileptogenic brain using a unified spatial-temporal-spectral source imaging framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin SeeberFunctional Brain Mapping Laboratory, Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, Campus Biotech, University of Geneva, 1201, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7891-5636
Lucia-Manuela CantonasFunctional Brain Mapping Laboratory, Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, Campus Biotech, University of Geneva, 1201, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mauritius HoevelsDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thibaut SesiaDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph M MichelFunctional Brain Mapping Laboratory, Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, Campus Biotech, University of Geneva, 1201, Geneva, Switzerland. Christoph.Michel@unige.ch.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcortical neuronal activity is highly relevant for mediating communication in large-scale brain networks. While electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings provide appropriate temporal resolution and coverage to study whole brain dynamics, the feasibility to detect subcortical signals is a matter of debate. Here, we investigate if scalp EEG can detect and correctly localize signals recorded with intracranial electrodes placed in the centromedial thalamus, and in the nucleus accumbens. Externalization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes, placed in these regions, provides the unique opportunity to record subcortical activity simultaneously with high-density (256 channel) scalp EEG. In three patients during rest with eyes closed, we found significant correlation between alpha envelopes derived from intracranial and EEG source reconstructed signals. Highest correlation was found for source signals in close proximity to the actual recording sites, given by the DBS electrode locations. Therefore, we present direct evidence that scalp EEG indeed can sense subcortical signals.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaBrainBrain MappingDeep Brain StimulationElectrodesElectroencephalographyHumansIntralaminar Thalamic NucleiMagnetic Resonance ImagingNucleus AccumbensObsessive-Compulsive DisorderScalpTomography, X-Ray ComputedTourette Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID30765707
PMCPMC6376013
OpenAlexW2911372390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.