ArticleBMJ open2019
Assessing the quality of primary healthcare in seven Chinese provinces with unannounced standardised patients: protocol of a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiphase optimization implementation strategy for tobacco cessation interventions in primary care clinics: A cluster-randomized type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Primary healthcare quality of migraine in China: a study using unannounced standardized patients.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Assessment of sanitation facilities in primary healthcare institutions across seven provinces in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Brief verbal intervention to address inappropriate prescriptions of chinese patent medicines among western practitioners in primary health care (BRAVERY): a study protocol for an unannounced standardized patient experiment with a factorial design randomized controlled trial in China.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Turnover intention and influential factors among primary healthcare workers in Guangdong province, China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Development of the implementability assessment tool for clinical practice guidelines based on the COSMIN framework and factorial experiment: a study protocol.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Quality of asynchronous webchatsThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Quality in screening and measuring blood pressure in China's primary health care: a national cross-sectional study using unannounced standardized patients.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Article
- The Agreement Between Virtual Patient and Unannounced Standardized Patient Assessments in Evaluating Primary Health Care Quality: Multicenter, Cross-sectional Pilot Study in 7 Provinces of China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Implementing Quality of Care Measures: Lessons from a Standardized Patient Study in Seven Provinces of China.American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Improving Data Surveillance Resilience Beyond COVID-19: Experiences of Primary heAlth Care quAlity Cohort In ChinA (ACACIA) Using Unannounced Standardized Patients.American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Distribution of health problems at the general outpatients' clinic of the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The effects of health system reform on medical services utilization and expenditures in China in 2004-2015.International health · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- The Quality of Tuberculosis Care in Urban Migrant Clinics in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Quality of Helicobacter pylori Infection Management Through Telemedicine: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of digestive diseasesObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary healthcare (PHC) serves as the cornerstone for the attainment of universal health coverage (UHC). Efforts to promote UHC should focus on the expansion of access and on healthcare quality. However, robust quality evidence has remained scarce in China. Common quality assessment methods such as chart abstraction, patient rating and clinical vignette use indirect information that may not represent real practice. This study will send standardised patients (SP or healthy person trained to consistently simulate the medical history, physical symptoms and emotional characteristics of a real patient) unannounced to PHC providers to collect quality information and represent real practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 1981 SP-clinician visits will be made to a random sample of PHC providers across seven provinces in China. SP cases will be developed for 10 tracer conditions in PHC. Each case will include a standard script for the SP to use and a quality checklist that the SP will complete after the clinical visit to indicate diagnostic and treatment activities performed by the clinician. Patient-centredness will be assessed according to the Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness Rating Scale by the SP. SP cases and the checklist will be developed through a standard protocol and assessed for content, face and criterion validity, and test-retest and inter-rater reliability before its full use. Various descriptive analyses will be performed for the survey results, such as a tabulation of quality scores across geographies and provider types. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Public Health of Sun Yat-sen University (#SYSU 2017-011). Results will be actively disseminated through print and social media, and SP tools will be made available for other researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.