Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764871›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2019

What is the additional value of MRI of the foot to the hand in undifferentiated arthritis to predict rheumatoid arthritis development?

Y J Dakkak, D M Boeters, A C Boer, M Reijnierse, A H M van der Helm-van Mil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y J DakkakDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. y.j.dakkak@lumc.nl.
D M BoetersDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A C BoerDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M ReijnierseDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A H M van der Helm-van MilDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NL

Funding

European Research Council 714312H2020 European Research Council 714312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation in the hand joints of patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) predicts progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unknown if adding MRI of the foot increases predictive accuracy compared to the hand alone.

methods1.5-T contrast-enhanced MRI of the unilateral foot (MTP-1-5) and hand (MCP-2-5 and wrist) was performed in 123 patients presenting with UA (not fulfilling the 2010 RA criteria) and scored for bone marrow edema (BME), synovitis and tenosynovitis. Symptom-free controls (n = 193) served as a reference for defining an abnormal MRI. Patients were followed for RA development ≤ 1 year, defined as fulfilling the classification criteria or initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs because of the expert opinion of RA. The added predictive value of foot MRI to hand MRI was evaluated.

resultsFifty-two percent developed RA. Foot tenosynovitis was predictive (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.01-6.43), independent of BME and synovitis (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.03-10.53), but not independent of CRP and number of swollen joints (OR 2.14, 95% CI 0.77-5.95). Hand tenosynovitis was also predictive independent of BME and synovitis (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.64-9.69) and independent of CRP and swollen joints (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.04-5.38). Adding foot tenosynovitis to hand tenosynovitis changed the sensitivity from 72 to 73%, specificity from 59 to 54% and AUC from 0.66 to 0.64; the net reclassification index was - 3.5.

conclusionMRI-detected tenosynovitis of the foot predicts progression to RA. However, adding MRI of the foot does not improve the predictive accuracy compared to MRI of the hand alone. In view of cost reduction, the performance of foot MRI for prognostic purposes in UA can be omitted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritisArthritis, RheumatoidDisease ProgressionEarly DiagnosisFemaleFoot JointsHand JointsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSynovitisTenosynovitisMagnetic resonance imagingMTP jointsRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30764871
PMCPMC6376768
OpenAlexW2941769793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.