Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764862›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2019

Do musculoskeletal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging identify synovitis and tenosynovitis at the same joints and tendons? A comparative study in early inflammatory arthritis and clinically suspect arthralgia.

Sarah Ohrndorf, Aleid C Boer, Debbie M Boeters, Robin M Ten Brinck, Gerd-R Burmester, Marion C Kortekaas, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Reliability and Availability of the 2017 EULAR-OMERACT Scoring System for Ultrasound Synovitis Assessment: Results From a Training and Reading Exercise.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah OhrndorfDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. sarah.ohrndorf@charite.de.
Aleid C BoerDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Debbie M BoetersDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robin M Ten BrinckDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gerd-R BurmesterDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Marion C KortekaasDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annette H M van der Helm-van MilDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

European Research Council 714312H2020 European Research Council Starting grant, agreement No 714312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUltrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are recommended in the diagnostic process of rheumatoid arthritis. Research on its comparability in early disease phases is scarce. Therefore, we compared synovitis and tenosynovitis detected by US and MRI on joint/tendon level.

methodsEight hundred forty joints and 700 tendons of 70 consecutive patients, presenting with inflammatory arthritis or clinically suspect arthralgia, underwent US and MRI of MCP (2-5), wrist and MTP (1-5) joints at the same day. Greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) synovitis were scored according to the modified Szkudlarek method (combining synovial effusion and hypertrophy) and the recently published EULAR-OMERACT method (synovial hypertrophy regardless of the presence of effusion) on static images. US-detected tenosynovitis was scored according to the OMERACT. MRI scans were scored according to the RAMRIS. Test characteristics were calculated on joint/tendon level with MRI as reference. Cut-off for US scores were ≥ 1 and ≥ 2 and for MRI ≥ 1.

resultsCompared to MRI, GS synovitis according to EULAR-OMERACT (cut-off ≥ 1) had a sensitivity ranging from 29 to 75% for the different joint locations; specificity ranged from 80 to 98%. For the modified Szkudlarek method, the sensitivity was 68-91% and specificity 52-71%. PD synovitis had a sensitivity of 30-54% and specificity 97-99% compared to MRI. The sensitivity to detect GS tenosynovitis was 50-78% and the specificity 80-94%. For PD tenosynovitis, the sensitivity was 19-58% and specificity 98-100%.

conclusionCurrent data showed that US is less sensitive than MRI in the early detection of synovitis and tenosynovitis, but resulted in only few non-specific findings. The higher sensitivity of MRI is at the expense of less accessibility and higher costs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthralgiaArthritis, RheumatoidEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansJointsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySynovitisTendonsArthralgiaEarly arthritisMagnetic resonance imagingMusculoskeletal ultrasoundRheumatoid arthritisSynovitisTenosynovitis

Identifiers

PMID30764862
PMCPMC6376767
OpenAlexW2930559785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.