Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764832›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019

Airway Management in the Emergency Department (The OcEAN-Study) - a prospective single centre observational cohort study.

Michael Bernhard, Sönke Nils Bax, Thomas Hartwig, Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor, Sirak Petros, Sven Bercker, Alexandra Ramshorn-Zimmer, André Gries

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Nontraumatic resuscitation room management of critically ill patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  16. Aspiration Pneumonia after Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Diagnostic Dilemma!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BernhardEmergency Department, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sönke Nils BaxEmergency Department, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. soenke@bax-se.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-0250
Thomas HartwigEmergency Department, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Maryam Yahiaoui-DoktorInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sirak PetrosMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sven BerckerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexandra Ramshorn-ZimmerEmergency Department, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
André GriesEmergency Department, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency airway management (AM) is a major key for successful resuscitation of critically ill non-traumatic (CINT) patients. Details of the AM of these patients in German emergency departments (ED) are unknown. This observational study describes epidemiology, airway techniques, success rates and complications of AM in CINT ED patients in the resuscitation room (RR).

methodsData was collected prospectively on adult CINT patients admitted to the RR of a single German university ED September 2014 to August 2015. Patient characteristics, out-of-hospital and in-hospital RR AM, complications and success rates were recorded using a self-developed airway registry form.

resultsDuring the study period 34,303 patients were admitted to the ED, out of those 21,074 patients for non-trauma emergencies. Suffering from severe acute life-threatening problems, 532 CINT patients were admitted to the RR. 150 (28.2%) CINT patients had received out-of-hospital AM. In 16 of these cases (10.7%) the inserted airway needed to be changed after RR admission (unrecognized oesophageal intubation: n = 2, laryngeal tube exchange: n = 14). 136 (25.6%) CINT patients without out-of-hospital AM received RR AM immediately after admission. The first-pass and overall success rate in the RR were 71 and 100%, respectively, and multiple intubation attempts were necessary in 29%. A lower Cormack/Lehane (C/L) grade was associated with less intubation attempts (C/L1/2 vs. 3/4: 1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.0002). Complication rate was 43%.

conclusionsOcEAN demonstrates the challenges of AM in CINT patients in a German ED RR. We propose a nation-wide ED airway registry to better track outcomes in the future.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementEmergency Service, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleGermanyHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesYoung AdultAirway managementComplicationsEmergency departmentFirst-pass successResuscitation room

Identifiers

PMID30764832
PMCPMC6376794
OpenAlexW2936551262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.