Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764829›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2019

Autophagy: roles in intestinal mucosal homeostasis and inflammation.

Sabah Haq, Jensine Grondin, Suhrid Banskota, Waliul I Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabah HaqFarncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Jensine GrondinFarncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Suhrid BanskotaFarncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Waliul I KhanFarncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. khanwal@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 20008486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal mucosa is a site of multiple stressors and forms the barrier between the internal and external environment. In the intestine, a complex interplay between the microbiota, epithelial barrier and the local immune system maintains homeostasis and promotes a healthy gut. One of the major cellular catabolic processes that regulate this homeostasis is autophagy. Autophagy is required to maintain anti-microbial defense, epithelial barrier integrity and mucosal immune response. Dysregulation of the autophagy process causes disruption of several aspects of the intestinal epithelium and the immune system that can lead to an inappropriate immune response and subsequent inflammation. Genome-wide association studies have found an association between several risk loci in autophagy genes and inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of the current review is to provide an update on the role of autophagy in intestinal mucosal physiology and in the control of inappropriate inflammation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyHomeostasisHumansInflammationIntestinal MucosaMiceRatsAutophagyEpitheliumImmune responseInflammationIntestinal mucosaMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID30764829
PMCPMC6375151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.