Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764796›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Identifying on admission patients likely to develop acute kidney injury in hospital.

Anastasios Argyropoulos, Stuart Townley, Paul M Upton, Stephen Dickinson, Adam S Pollard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute Kidney Injury in the Intensive Care Unit: The Most Reliable Way to Predict the Future is to Create It.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasios ArgyropoulosCentre for Implementation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. a.argyropoulos@soton.ac.uk.
Stuart TownleyCollege of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall,, TR10 9FE, UK.
Paul M UptonResearch, Development, and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, TR1 3HD, UK.
Stephen DickinsonResearch, Development, and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, TR1 3HD, UK.
Adam S PollardResearch, Development, and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, TR1 3HD, UK.
Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) continues to increase in the UK, with associated mortality rates remaining significant. Approximately one fifth of hospital admissions are associated with AKI and approximately a third of patients with AKI in hospital develop AKI during their time in hospital. A fifth of these cases are considered avoidable. Early risk detection remains key to decreasing AKI in hospitals, where sub-optimal care was noted for half of patients who developed AKI.

methodsElectronic anonymised data for adults admitted into the Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust (RCHT) between 18th March and 31st December 2015 was trimmed to that collected within the first 24 h of hospitalisation. These datasets were split according to three separate time periods: data used for training the Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Logic Systems (FLS) and the multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models; data used for testing; and data from a later patient spell used for validation. Three fuzzy logic models and three MLR models were developed to link characteristics of patients diagnosed with a maximum stage AKI within 7 days of admission: the first models to identify any AKI Stage (FLS I, MLR I), the second for patterns of AKI Stage 2 or 3 (FLS II, MLR II), and the third to identify AKI Stage 3 (FLS III, MLR III). Model accuracy is expressed by area under the curve (AUC).

resultsAccuracy for each model during internal validation was: FLS I and MLR I (AUC 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77); FLS II (AUC 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.85) and MLR II (AUC 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.83); FLS III and MLR III (AUC 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98).

conclusionsFLS II and FLS III (and the respective MLR models) can identify with a high level of accuracy patients at high risk of developing AKI in hospital. These two models cannot be properly assessed against prior studies as this is the first attempt at quantifying the risk of developing specific Stages of AKI for a broad cohort of both medical and surgical inpatients. FLS I and MLR I performance is comparable to other existing models.

Indexed as

Patient AdmissionAcute Kidney InjuryAgedArea Under CurveBlood Cell CountCreatinineDatasets as TopicEnglandFemaleFuzzy LogicHospital MortalityHospitals, PublicHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedCreatinineAcute kidney injuryAKIForward selectionFuzzy logicMultivariable logistic regressionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30764796
PMCPMC6376785
OpenAlexW2924086571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.