Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764782›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Revisiting racial differences in ESRD due to ADPKD in the United States.

Erin L Murphy, Feng Dai, Katrina Lehmann Blount, Madeline L Droher, Lauren Liberti, Deidra C Crews, Neera K Dahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Addressing "Second Hits" in the Pursuit of Greater Equity in Health Outcomes for Individuals with ADPKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Article
  5. Health Disparities in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) in the United States.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L MurphySection of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Feng DaiBiostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Katrina Lehmann BlountSection of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Madeline L DroherSection of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Lauren LibertiSection of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Deidra C CrewsDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neera K DahlSection of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. neera.dahl@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-9961
Yale University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) affects all races. Whether the progression of ADPKD varies by race remains unclear.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study from 2004 to 2013 non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic whites of all ages classified in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) with incident ESRD from ADPKD (n = 23,647), hypertension/large vessel disease (n = 296,352), or diabetes mellitus (n = 451,760) were stratified into five-year age categories ranging from < 40 to > 75 (e.g., < 40, 40-44, 45-49, …, 75+). The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to determine the association of race and incidence of ESRD from ADPKD, diabetes, or hypertension. The difference in the proportions of ESRD in non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white patients at each age categorical bin was compared by two-sample proportion test. The age of ESRD onset between non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white patients at each year was compared using two-sample t-test with unequal variance.

results1.068% of non-Hispanic blacks and 2.778% of non-Hispanic whites had ESRD attributed to ADPKD. Non-Hispanic blacks were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to have ESRD attributed to ADPKD (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) = 0.38 (0.36-0.39), p <  0.0001). Using US Census data as the denominator to adjust for population differences non-Hispanic blacks were still slightly under-represented (OR (95% CI) 0.94 (0.91-0.96), p = 0.004). However, non-Hispanic blacks with ADPKD had a younger age of ESRD (54.4 years ±13) than non-Hispanic whites (55.9 years ±12.8) (p <  0.0001). For those < 40 years old, more non-Hispanic blacks had incident ESRD from ADPKD than non-Hispanic whites (9.49% vs. 7.68%, difference (95% CI) = 1.81% (0.87-2.84%), p <  0.001) for the combined years examined.

conclusionsAs previously shown, we find the incidence of ESRD from ADPKD in non-Hispanic blacks is lower than in non-Hispanic whites. Among the younger ADPKD population (age < 40), however, more non-Hispanic blacks initiated dialysis than non-Hispanic whites. Non-Hispanic blacks with ADPKD initiated dialysis younger than non-Hispanic whites. A potential implication of these findings may be that black race should be considered an additional risk factor for progression in ADPKD.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolDiabetic NephropathiesDisease ProgressionHumansHypertensionIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)End-stage renal disease (ESRD)IncidenceUnited States renal data system (USRDS)

Identifiers

PMID30764782
PMCPMC6376748
OpenAlexW2921394409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.