Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764754›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2019

The epigenetic regulation of HsMar1, a human DNA transposon.

Sylvaine Renault, Murielle Genty, Alison Gabori, Catherine Boisneau, Charles Esnault, Thomas Dugé de Bernonville, Corinne Augé-Gouillou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvaine RenaultEA 6306 Instabilité génétique et cancer, Université de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, UFR Pharmacie, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200, Tours, France. sylvaine.renault@univ-tours.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-8855
Murielle GentyEA 6306 Instabilité génétique et cancer, Université de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, UFR Pharmacie, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200, Tours, France.
Alison GaboriEA 6306 Instabilité génétique et cancer, Université de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, UFR Pharmacie, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200, Tours, France.
Catherine BoisneauUMR CITERES CNRS 7324, Université de Tours, 35 Allée Ferdinand de Lesseps, 37200, Tours, France.
Charles EsnaultEA 6306 Instabilité génétique et cancer, Université de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, UFR Pharmacie, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200, Tours, France.
Thomas Dugé de BernonvilleEA 2106 BBV, UFR Sciences et Techniques, UFR Pharmacie, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200, Tours, France.
Corinne Augé-GouillouEA 6306 Instabilité génétique et cancer, Université de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, UFR Pharmacie, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200, Tours, France.
Université de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth classes of transposable elements (DNA and RNA) are tightly regulated at the transcriptional level leading to the inactivation of transposition via epigenetic mechanisms. Due to the high copies number of these elements, the hypothesis has emerged that their regulation can coordinate a regulatory network of genes. Herein, we investigated whether transposition regulation of HsMar1, a human DNA transposon, differs in presence or absence of endogenous HsMar1 copies. In the case where HsMar1 transposition is regulated, the number of repetitive DNA sequences issued by HsMar1 and distributed in the human genome makes HsMar1 a good candidate to regulate neighboring gene expression by epigenetic mechanisms.

resultsA recombinant active HsMar1 copy was inserted in HeLa (human) and CHO (hamster) cells and its genomic excision monitored. We show that HsMar1 excision is blocked in HeLa cells, whereas CHO cells are competent to promote HsMar1 excision. We demonstrate that de novo HsMar1 insertions in HeLa cells (human) undergo rapid silencing by cytosine methylation and apposition of H3K9me3 marks, whereas de novo HsMar1 insertions in CHO cells (hamster) are not repressed and enriched in H3K4me3 modifications. The overall analysis of HsMar1 endogenous copies in HeLa cells indicates that neither full-length endogenous inactive copies nor their Inverted Terminal Repeats seem to be specifically silenced, and are, in contrast, devoid of epigenetic marks. Finally, the setmar gene, derived from HsMar1, presents H3K4me3 modifications as expected for a human housekeeping gene.

conclusionsOur work highlights that de novo and old HsMar1 are not similarly regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. Old HsMar1 are generally detected as lacking epigenetic marks, irrespective their localisation relative to the genes. Considering the putative existence of a network associating HsMar1 old copies and SETMAR, two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses are proposed: active and inactive HsMar1 copies are not similarly regulated or/and regulations concern only few loci (and few genes) that cannot be detected at the whole genome level.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCHO CellsCricetulusDNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsGenomicsHeLa CellsHistone CodeHumansDNA Transposable ElementsEpigeneticMobile DNANetworkTransposon

Identifiers

PMID30764754
PMCPMC6375154
OpenAlexW2939479139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.