Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Maintenance of Gains, Morbidity, and Mortality at 1 Year Following Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Middle-Income Country: A Wait-List Control Crossover Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02575976 (Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Brazilian Patients Assisted by Public Health Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Brazilian Patients Assisted by Public Health Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients undergoing coronary artery operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on current randomized controlled trials.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence of Cardioprotective Medication Use in Coronary Heart Disease Patients in South America: Systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Global heart · 2022Pooled it
- The Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Lipid Levels in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global heart · 2022Pooled it
- Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of cardiac rehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesPooled it
- Maintenance of Gains, Morbidity, and Mortality at 1 Year Following Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Middle-Income Country: A Wait-List Control Crossover Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Trial
- Preliminary Effects of a Structured Educational Program in Cardiac Patients at Different Stages of Enrollment in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation.Community health equity research & policy · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Translation and evaluation of a comprehensive educational program for cardiac rehabilitation patients in Latin America: A multi-national, longitudinal study.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- Comparison of cardiac rehabilitation (exercise + education), exercise only, and usual care for patients with coronary artery disease: A non-randomized retrospective analysis.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of an Education Intervention Among Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients in Canada: A Multi-Site Study.CJC open · 2020Article
- A qualitative study of patient's perceptions of two cardiac rehabilitation models.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
- Cardiac rehabilitation availability and delivery in Brazil: a comparison to other upper middle-income countries.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Despite the epidemic of cardiovascular diseases in middle-income countries, few trials are testing the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ). This trial assessed (1) maintenance of functional capacity, risk factor control, knowledge, and heart-health behaviors and (2) mortality and morbidity at 6 months following CR in a middle-income country. Methods and Results Eligible Brazilian coronary patients were initially randomized (1:1:1 concealed) to 1 of 3 parallel arms (comprehensive CR [exercise plus education], exercise-only CR , or wait-list control). The CR programs were 6 months in duration, at which point follow-up assessments were performed. Mortality and morbidity were ascertained from chart and patient or family report (blinded). Controls were then offered CR (crossover). Outcomes were again assessed 6 months later (blinded). ANCOVA was performed for each outcome at 12 months. Overall, 115 (88.5%) patients were randomized, and 62 (53.9%) were retained at 1 year. At 6 months, 23 (58.9%) of those 39 initially randomized to the wait-list control elected to attend CR . Functional capacity, risk factors, knowledge, and heart-health behaviors were maintained from 6 to 12 months in participants from both CR arms (all P>0.05). At 1 year, knowledge was significantly greater with comprehensive CR at either time point ( P<0.001). There were 2 deaths. Hospitalizations ( P=0.03), nonfatal myocardial infarctions ( P=0.04), and percutaneous coronary interventions ( P=0.03) were significantly fewer with CR than control at 6 months. Conclusions CR participation is associated with lower morbidity, long-term maintenance of functional capacity, risk factors, and heart-health behaviors, as well as with greater cardiovascular knowledge compared with no CR . Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02575976.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.