Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30764652›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2019

Comparative Safety of Aspiration Thrombectomy Catheters Utilizing Prospective, Active Surveillance of the NCDR CathPCI Registry.

Arjun Majithia, Michael E Matheny, Jessica K Paulus, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Susan Robbins, Henry Ssemaganda, Kathleen Hewitt, Angelo Ponirakis, Nilsa Loyo-Berrios, Issam Moussa and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Active surveillance for implanted devices: strength in numbers.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arjun MajithiaComparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).
Michael E MathenyVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System and Vanderbilt University, Nashville (M.E.M.).
Jessica K PaulusPredictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (J.K.P.).
Danica Marinac-DabicCenter for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), FDA, Silver Spring, MD (D.M.-D., N.L.-B.).
Susan RobbinsComparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).
Henry SsemagandaComparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).
Kathleen HewittNational Cardiovascular Data Registry, American College of Cardiology, Washington DC (K.H., A.P.).
Angelo PonirakisNational Cardiovascular Data Registry, American College of Cardiology, Washington DC (K.H., A.P.).
Nilsa Loyo-BerriosCenter for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), FDA, Silver Spring, MD (D.M.-D., N.L.-B.).
Issam MoussaRutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (I.M.).
Joseph DrozdaMercy Health, St Louis, MO (J.D.).
Sharon-Lise NormandHarvard Medical School and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (S.-L.N.).
Frederic S ResnicComparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).
VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

THE MDEPINET MEDICAL COUNTER MEASURES STUDYU01FD004493 · FDA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NORMAND, SHARON-LISE TERESA, RESNIC, FREDERIC S · 2012 to 2012
$1.6M
FDA HHS U01 FD004493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Current strategies for ensuring the postmarket safety of medical devices are limited by small sample size and reliance on voluntary reporting of adverse events. Prospective, active surveillance of clinical registries may provide early warnings in the postmarket evaluation of medical device safety but has not been demonstrated in national clinical data registries. Methods and Results The CathPCI DELTA (Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis) study was designed to assess the feasibility of prospective, active safety surveillance of medical devices within a national cardiovascular registry. We sought to assess the ability of our surveillance strategy to avoid false safety alerts by conducting an active safety surveillance study of aspiration thrombectomy catheters using data within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry, where no difference in safety outcomes were anticipated for the primary in-hospital safety outcome of death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We performed a propensity-matched analysis of 5 aspiration thrombectomy catheter devices used during percutaneous coronary intervention among 95 925 patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction between January 1, 2011 and September 30, 2013. After 33 months of surveillance, no safety alerts were triggered for the primary safety endpoints of death or MACE, with no between-catheter differences observed. The absolute risk of death during acute hospitalization ranged from 5.11% to 5.32% among the most commonly used aspiration thrombectomy catheter devices, with relative risks for death ranging from 0.96 to 1.03. The absolute risk of MACE ranged from 9.78% to 10.18%, with relative risks for MACE ranging from 0.99 to 1.02. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of death or MACE between any of the aspiration thrombectomy catheter devices analyzed. Conclusions The CathPCI DELTA study demonstrates that prospective, active safety surveillance of national clinical registries is feasible to provide near-real-time safety assessments of new medical devices.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingAgedCardiac CatheterizationEquipment DesignEquipment FailureFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk Assessmenthospitalizationpercutaneous coronary interventionregistriesriskthrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID30764652
PMCPMC12128650
OpenAlexW2912238181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.