Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30763727›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2019

Survivor and Clinician Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: An Engineering, Primary Care, and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health.

Colleen M Morken, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Amanda K Swiecichowski, James E Haine, Zachary T Williams, Kirsten Norslien, Natalia Arroyo, Xiao Zhang, Bethaney Campbell, Eneida A Mendonca and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Understanding Posttreatment Patient-Provider Communication and Follow-Up Care Among Self-Identified Rural Cancer Survivors in Illinois.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen M MorkenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Amye J TevaarwerkDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Amanda K SwiecichowskiCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
James E HaineDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Zachary T WilliamsCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Kirsten NorslienGilda's Club, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Natalia ArroyoCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Xiao ZhangCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Bethaney CampbellCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Eneida A MendoncaDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics and Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Mark B JuckettDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Mary E SestoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: mesesto@medicine.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
WORD PROCESSORP30CA013330 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN C. ALMO · 1985 to 2026
$111.2M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013330NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-term care of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors poses special challenges owing to a myriad of possible chronic and/or late complications. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed as tools to communicate information on the late effects of treatment and recommended follow-up care to clinicians and survivors. The primary aims of this study were to determine SCP content and format, as well as to assess the preferred timing of SCP provision following HSCT. HSCT survivors and nontransplantation clinicians (oncologists and primary care physicians) were invited to participate in a survey evaluating the usefulness and utility of a sample HSCT-specific SCP with a treatment summary generated by autopopulation from an electronic health record (EHR). All participating HSCT survivors (n = 29) and clinicians (n = 18) indicated a desire to receive an SCP. More than 85% of the participants perceived information about treatments received, recommended follow-up and health maintenance including vaccinations, survivor and clinician resources, and graft-versus-host disease and other late/chronic side effects to be useful. The majority of survivors also believed that care team contact information was useful. In addition, >85% of survivors and clinicians agreed that the SCP increased their understanding of treatments and chronic/late side effects, improved health care provided, and were satisfied with the SCP and found it understandable and easy to use. The majority of survivors indicated that additional information should be added to the SCP, whereas some clinicians deemed the SCP too long. Survivors preferred to receive the SCP as a paper document at the end of a regular follow-up visit and review it with a cancer clinician, whereas clinicians preferred to receive the SCP through the EHR. These findings will help improve the design of future SCPs for use by HSCT survivors and clinicians. Future work will include leveraging the EHR to ease the burden of creating user-centered documents.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSurvivorsSurvivorshipTransplantation ConditioningClinician satisfactionHematopoietic stem cell transplantationSurvivor satisfactionSurvivorship care plan

Identifiers

PMID30763727
PMCPMC6559830
OpenAlexW2914816125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.