Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30763404›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the number of smoked cigarettes in tobacco smokers.

Faisal Alghamdi, Ahmed Alhussien, Meshal Alohali, Abdullah Alatawi, Tariq Almusned, Shirley Fecteau, Syed Shahid Habib, Shahid Bashir

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Brain stimulation therapeutics.Addiction neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Faisal AlghamdiFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlhussienFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Meshal AlohaliFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlatawiFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Tariq AlmusnedFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Shirley FecteauLaboratory of Canada Research Chair in Cognitive Neuroscience, CERVO Brain Research Center, Medical School, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
Syed Shahid HabibFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Shahid BashirNeuroscience Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6286-6895
King Saud University · SAHarvard University · USUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies reported that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) reduced craving and cigarette smoking. We aimed to evaluate whether 3 sessions of tDCS over the DLPFC modulate cigarette smoking which is a critical factor in tobacco smokers.

methodsIn a double-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel experimental study, 22 participants who wished to quit smoking received tDCS with the cathodal over the right DLPFC and anodal over the left DLPFC based on the 10-20 EEG international system (F4, F3) at an intensity of 1.5 mA for 20 minutes during three consecutive days. For sham stimulation, the electrodes placement was the same as for the active stimulation.

resultsFor the short time interval (8 days after the end of the tDCS regimen), the number of smoked cigarettes was reduced similarly in the active and sham groups (p < 0.001). Also, at the long time-interval (4 months after the end of the tDCS regimen) as compared to pre-tDCS, there was no significant difference in the number of smoked cigarettes in the active (p = 0.806) or the sham (p = 0.573) groups. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences between the active and sham tDCS groups on cigarette smoking.

conclusionThese findings suggested that 3 sessions of tDCS over the right and left DLPFC may reduce number of smoked cigarettes for short-time period but might not be significantly more effective than sham to decrease cigarette smoking.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCravingDouble-Blind MethodHumansPlacebo EffectPrefrontal CortexSmokersSmoking CessationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30763404
PMCPMC6375608
OpenAlexW2913705190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.