Observational studyMedicine2019
Spontaneous regression of cervical discs: Retrospective analysis of 14 cases.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spontaneous regression of a broad-based protruded cervical disc: A case report and review of the literature.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- The imaging of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.Skeletal radiology · 2023Review
- Unnecessary Cervical Discectomy - A simple test to differentiate between Cervical and Shoulder Pathology: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2022Article
- Emerging Issues Questioning the Current Treatment Strategies for Lumbar Disc Herniation.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Spontaneous regression of herniated cervical disc: A case report and literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2021Review
- The Immune Privilege of the Intervertebral Disc: Implications for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Treatment.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical disc herniation is a condition which arises from compression of cervical spinal nerve root by the degenerated disc and vast majority of the patients are aged between 30 and 40 years. Spontaneous regression of cervical disc was first reported by Kriegerand Maniker in 1992. Our study is the second large series in literature. Besides, 4 patients are the first who were shown to have resorption in C 4-5.The records of patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation who applied to the Spine Polyclinic between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The files of the patients who were recommended surgery with the diagnosis of cervical disc herniation were examined. Patients who did not accept surgery on their own initiative, but who attended our outpatient clinic for a check-up were included in the study.Of a total of 14 patients, 28.57% (n = 4) were male and 71.43% (n = 10) were female. Mean age of the patients was 40.79 (range 25-60).The results of the study indicate that likelihood of spontaneous regression is higher in para-central or foraminal disc compared to central disc hernias. Although there are a limited number of case reports in the literature, conservative treatment seems to be a good option in patients without neurological deficits, with foraminal disc hernias and not requiring emergency surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.