Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762663›Full record

Trial reportPsychosomatic medicine2019

Exploratory Investigation of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Intervention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Odor Sensitivity.

David C Houghton, Thomas W Uhde, Jeffrey J Borckardt, Bernadette M Cortese

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychosomatic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07658365 (Modulation of Olfactory Valence by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07658365 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Modulation of Olfactory Valence by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound (tFUS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled28ConditionsHealthy, OlfactionArmstranscranial focused ultrasound (tFUS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Sensory processing in medically unexplained pain syndrome. A systematic review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C HoughtonFrom the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences (Houghton, Uhde, Borckardt, Cortese), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and Psychological and Brain Sciences Department (Houghton), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Thomas W Uhde
Jeffrey J Borckardt
Bernadette M Cortese
Houghton University · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEnhanced odor sensitivity is a phenomenon that potentially underlies conditions such as multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS). Currently, there are no treatments that have been shown to effectively decrease odor sensitivity. Given similarities of odor hypersensitivity/MCS to pain sensitization disorders such as fibromyalgia, there may be a potential for interventions that improve pain tolerance to modulate odor sensitivity.

methodsThis exploratory study randomized 72 healthy community adult volunteers to receive one of six treatments in between two assessments of thermal pain tolerance and odor threshold. Participants were randomized to receive either cathodal, anodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) aimed at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In addition, participants were provided a brief cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) for pain consisting of task framing, cognitive restructuring, and distraction technique training, or a control intervention consisting of information about pain.

resultsPersons who received a brief CBI showed significantly increased odor thresholds (reduced sensitivity) during intervention (F (1,62) = 7.29, p = .009, ηp = .11), whereas the control intervention was not associated with altered odor thresholds. Moreover, in those who received brief CBI, more severe anxiety associated with larger reductions in odor sensitivity (ρ = .364, p = .035). There was no effect of tDCS (F (2,62) = .11, p = .90) nor interaction between tDCS and CBI (F (2,62) = .32, p = .73).

conclusionsGiven the connection between anxiety and MCS, results suggest that CBT techniques for somatic processes may show promise in treating conditions characterized by increased sensitivity to odors (e.g., MCS).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdorantsOlfaction DisordersPain ThresholdSensory ThresholdsSmellYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30762663
PMCPMC6961818
OpenAlexW2919336480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.