Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762317›Full record

SynthesisArthritis care & research2020

Men and Women's Occupational Activities and the Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Hip, or Hands: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research.

Monique A M Gignac, Emma Irvin, Kim Cullen, Dwayne Van Eerd, Dorcas E Beaton, Quenby Mahood, Chris McLeod, Catherine L Backman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis care & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Paracetamol: A Review of Guideline Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Monique A M GignacInstitute for Work and Health and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emma IrvinInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kim CullenInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, and School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dwayne Van EerdInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dorcas E BeatonInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quenby MahoodInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chris McLeodInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, and School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Catherine L BackmanUniversity of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-7947
Institute for Work & Health · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the evidence for an increased risk of osteoarthritis in the hip, knee, hand, wrist, finger, ankle, foot, shoulder, neck, and spine related to diverse occupational activities of men and women and to examine dose-response information related to the frequency, intensity, and duration of work exposures and the risk of osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsEstablished guidelines for systematic reviews in occupational health and safety studies were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2017. Studies were reviewed for relevance, quality was appraised, and data were extracted and synthesized.

resultsSixty-nine studies from 23 countries yielded strong and moderate evidence for lifting, cumulative physical loads, full-body vibration, and kneeling/squatting/bending as increasing the risks of developing OA in men and women. Strong and moderate evidence existed for no increased risk of OA related to sitting, standing, and walking (hip and knee OA), lifting and carrying (knee OA), climbing ladders (knee OA), driving (knee OA), and highly repetitive tasks (hand OA). Variability in dose-response data resulted in an inability to synthesize these data.

conclusionEvidence points to the potential for OA occupational recommendations and practice considerations to be developed for women and men. However, research attention is needed to overcome deficits in the measurement and recall of specific work activities so that recommendations and practice considerations can provide the specificity needed to be adopted in workplaces.

Indexed as

HandFemaleHumansMaleOccupational ExposureOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, Knee

Identifiers

PMID30762317
PMCPMC7065017
OpenAlexW2913019552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.