Trial reportActa ophthalmologica2019
Ultrahigh-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography for analysis of corneal microarchitecture during wound healing.
Trial report in Acta ophthalmologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06854393 (Lacripep, a Novel Investigational Agent, for Corneal Wound Healing and Ocular Surface Homeostasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lacripep, a Novel Investigational Agent, for Corneal Wound Healing and Ocular Surface Homeostasis
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of AS-OCT in Managing Corneal Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Corneal Optical Coherence Tomography Speckle in Crosslinked and Untreated Rabbit Eyes in Response to Elevated Intraocular Pressure.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Quantitative measurement of mechanical properties in wound healing processes in a corneal stroma model by using vibrational optical coherence elastography (OCE).Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Advances in Imaging Technology of Anterior Segment of the Eye.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Article
- Characterization of dry eye disease in a mouse model by optical coherence tomography and fluorescein staining.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo employ ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) optical coherence tomography (OCT) for investigation of the early wound healing process in corneal epithelium.
methodsA custom-built UHR-OCT system assessed epithelial healing in human keratoconic cornea after epi-off crosslinking (CXL) procedure and a wound healing model in rabbits with iatrogenic corneal injury. 3D OCT data sets enhanced obtaining epithelial thickness maps and evaluation of reepithelization stage. Accompanying changes in deeper corneal microarchitecture were analysed.
resultsThe mean central corneal thickness in 40 eyes with keratoconus at baseline was 482.7 ± 38.2 μm, while mean central epithelial thickness (CET) was 43.8 ± 6.4 μm. At the final visit 20 ± 5 days post-CXL procedure, CET was 35.0 ± 5.8 μm, significantly thinner after reepithelization (p < 0.001). Surgical success was assessed at the final visit through the demarcation line (DL), identified at 43.7 ± 13.5% stromal depth. In rabbits, the mean CET in 20 eyes at baseline was 35.9 ± 2.6 μm. In rabbits that revealed complete wound closure (10/20 eyes) at the last study day at 72 hr, CET was significantly thinner compared to baseline (30.4 ± 2.8 μm versus 35.4 ± 2.9 μm, p = 0.005). An intra-stromal landmark indicating early keratocyte apoptosis was measured at 30.0 ± 5.1% stromal depth. Epithelial thickness maps showed the time-course of corneal healing.
conclusionUltrahigh-resolution (UHR)-OCT provided precise assessment of epithelial wound and its healing by 3D-mapping. In addition, microarchitectural changes in the cornea in early phases of epithelial healing were revealed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.