Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762300›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Real-world outcomes of various regimens of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy in non-driver gene mutation advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Zhongtai Wang, Hui Zhang, Chunhua Zhou, Xiaoyan Long, Rui Guan, Nong Yang, Yongchang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mutational Profile Evaluates Response and Survival to First-Line Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhongtai WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chunhua ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaoyan LongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Rui GuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Nong YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yongchang ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6829-7176
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis real-world study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for non-driver genes mutation non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and establish evidence-based optimal regimen for rh-endostatin. PATIENTS AND

methodsUsing propensity score matching (cut-off: 0.01), 88 patients were eligible for our study, 34 of which received platinum-based chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy group), 54 patients received platinum-based chemotherapy plus rh-endostatin (rh-endostatin group). Among those 54 patients in the rh-endostatin group, 27 patients received rh-endostatin administered at 7.5 mg/m

resultsThere were no differences in clinic characteristics among 3 groups. Compared with chemotherapy group, rh-endostatin group improved PFS and OS significantly. The median PFS was 6 months vs 4.5 months (P = 0.047), and median OS was 20 months vs 10 months (P < 0.001). The ORR was 33.3% vs 20.6% (P = 0.197) and DCR was 83.3% vs 64.7% (P = 0.046) in the rh-endostatin group and chemotherapy group, respectively. The comparisons between the rh-endostatin 7d and 14d groups revealed a significant improvement in PFS for the rh-endostatin 7d group (P = 0.044), but no significant differences in OS (P = 0.111), ORR (P = 0.074), or DCR (P = 0.234). The incidences of grade 3 and 4 adverse events were similar among 3 groups.

conclusionChemotherapy combined with rh-endostatin was more effective than chemotherapy alone for non-driver gene mutation NSCLC patients. The administration of rh-endostatin for 7 days at 15 mg/m

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDrug Administration ScheduleEndostatinsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMalePlatinumPropensity ScoreRecombinant ProteinsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeEndostatinsPlatinumRecombinant Proteinschemotherapydifferent administrationnon-small cell lung cancerreal-world studyrecombinant human-endostatin

Identifiers

PMID30762300
PMCPMC6488207
OpenAlexW2911302900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.