Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762225›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2019

Change in mammographic density across birth cohorts of Dutch breast cancer screening participants.

George Napolitano, Elsebeth Lynge, Martin Lillholm, Ilse Vejborg, Carla H van Gils, Mads Nielsen, Nico Karssemeijer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George NapolitanoDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-2599
Elsebeth LyngeNykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-5236
Martin LillholmDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ilse VejborgDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carla H van GilsDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health, Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mads NielsenDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nico KarssemeijerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University, Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High mammographic density is a well-known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to search for a possible birth cohort effect on mammographic density, which might contribute to explain the increasing breast cancer incidence. We separately analyzed left and right breast density of Dutch women from a 13-year period (2003-2016) in the breast cancer screening programme. First, we analyzed age-specific changes in average percent dense volume (PDV) across birth cohorts. A linear regression analysis (PDV vs. year of birth) indicated a small but statistically significant increase in women of: 1) age 50 and born from 1952 to 1966 (left, slope = 0.04, p = 0.003; right, slope = 0.09, p < 0.0001); 2) age 55 and born from 1948 to 1961 (right, slope = 0.04, p = 0.01); and 3) age 70 and born from 1933 to 1946 (right, slope = 0.05, p = 0.002). A decrease of total breast volume seemed to explain the increase in PDV. Second, we compared proportion of women with dense breast in women born in 1946-1953 and 1959-1966, and observed a statistical significant increase of proportion of highly dense breast in later born women, in the 51 to 55 age-groups for the left breast (around a 20% increase in each age-group), and in the 50 to 56 age-groups for the right breast (increase ranging from 27% to 48%). The study indicated a slight increase in mammography density across birth cohorts, most pronounced for women in their early 50s, and more marked for the right than for the left breast.

Indexed as

Breast DensityAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNetherlandsRegression Analysisbreast cancer screeningmammographic densitysecular trendsvolumetric breast density

Identifiers

PMID30762225
PMCPMC6850337
OpenAlexW2914761615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.