Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762192›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2019

Posterior laryngofissure using a surgical contact diode laser: an experimental feasibility study.

Arteiro Queiroz Menezes, Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso, Christopher Kengo Nagao, Helio Minamoto, Benoit Jacques Bibas, Isaac de Faria Soares Rodrigues, José Pinhata Otoch, Marisa Dolhnikoff, Mauro Canzian, Marilia Wellichan Mancini and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arteiro Queiroz MenezesDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Paulo Francisco Guerreiro CardosoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. cardosop@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-4165
Christopher Kengo NagaoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Helio MinamotoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Benoit Jacques BibasDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Isaac de Faria Soares RodriguesDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
José Pinhata OtochDiscipline of Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery (LIM 26), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455-4° andar, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil.
Marisa DolhnikoffDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, sala 1155, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil.
Mauro CanzianLABPAC Pathology Lab, Rua Calixto da Mota 72, São Paulo, SP, 04117-100, Brazil.
Marilia Wellichan ManciniNúcleo de Pesquisa e Ensino de Fototerapia nas Ciências da Saúde-NUPEN, Rua Pedro Fernandes Alonso 766, São Carlos, SP, 13562-380, Brazil.
Paulo Manuel Pêgo-FernandesDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, Bloco I, 7° andar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil grants 2015/17847-1 and 2016/25437-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of a 980-nm contact diode laser (CDL) as a method for creating a posterior laryngofissure in live pigs. Twenty-eight Landrace pigs (15-20 kg) were anesthetized, intubated, ventilated, and submitted to a cervical tracheostomy. An anterior and posterior midline longitudinal laryngofissure incision was created according to randomization-control (n = 4), posterior laryngofissure with a scalpel blade; electrocautery (n = 12), posterior laryngofissure by electrocautery (10, 15, 20, 25 W powers); CDL (n = 12), posterior laryngofissure by the CDL (10, 15, 20, 25 W peak powers in pulsed mode). Larynx and proximal trachea were excised, prepared for histopathology, and digital morphometric analysis. Measurements in and within each group were analyzed (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test) with a level of significance of p < 0.05. Incision width was not different between the groups, as well as in the powers used in CDL (p = 0.161) and electrocautery group (p = 0.319). The depth of the incisions was smaller in the Laser group compared to control (p = 0.007), and in the electrocautery compared to control (p = 0.026). Incision area was smaller in CDL compared with the control (p = 0.027), and not different between laser and electrocautery groups (p = 0.199). The lateral thermal damage produced by electrocautery was the largest, with a significant difference between laser and electrocautery (p = 0.018), and between electrocautery and control (p = 0.004), whereas the comparison between laser and control showed no significant differences (p = 0.588). The posterior laryngofissure incision using a 980-nm CDL is feasible resulting in smaller incisional area and less lateral thermal damage.

Indexed as

Lasers, SemiconductorAnimalsElectrocoagulationFeasibility StudiesLarynxLaser TherapySwineContact diode laserLarynxPigsSurgeryTracheal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID30762192
OpenAlexW2912671775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.