ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2019
The Role of Troponin for Acute Heart Failure.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrafiltration for acute heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Acute heart failure in non-cardiac surgery.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Perpetually Evolving Frontier.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The significance of historical troponin elevation in acute heart failure: Not as reassuring as previously assumed.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023Article
- Could Endothelin-1 Be a Promising Neurohormonal Biomarker in Acute Heart Failure?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Global historical retrospect and future prospects on biomarkers of heart failure: A bibliometric analysis and science mapping.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Accuracy of high-sensitive troponin depending on renal function for clinical outcome prediction in patients with acute heart failure.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
- Article
- Observational
- Case report: Acute toxic myocardial damage caused by 5-fluorouracil-from enigma to success.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Past, Present, and Future of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Promises and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Survival in acute heart failure in intensive cardiac care unit: a prospective study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Observational
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review the mechanisms, clinical interpretation, prognostic role, and future research regarding cardiac troponin (cTn) in the assessment of acute heart failure (AHF) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). RECENT
findingscTn has become a necessary component of the evaluation of AHF patients in the ED, largely because of its independently predictive value as a prognosticator of poor outcome. High-sensitivity assays (hs-cTn) may add risk stratification value beyond conventional assays, specifically with regard to identifying low-risk AHF patients. Moreover, as the complex mechanisms of cTn release in AHF continue to be elucidated, recent studies suggest that many of the key hemodynamic derangements that define specific AHF syndromes may also be direct culprits in cTn release. cTn is released in AHF in response to both non-ischemic (e.g., increased afterload, increased preload, inflammatory signaling, altered calcium handling) and ischemic mechanisms. cTn detectable on conventional sensitivity assays predicts poor prognosis when measured in the ED or when noted in historical data such as past ED visits or at the time of discharge from the most recent AHF hospitalization. hs-cTn assays provide detectable values in nearly all AHF patients. Evidence is evolving on using hs-cTn levels below the upper limit of normal to potentially identify low-risk ED patients, and further research is needed. Among the classically cited risk factors for AHF mortality, cTn and natriuretic peptides stand as independent and synergistic prognostic factors even after adjustment for confounders. Many other risk factors, such as ejection fraction, often failed to retain ED prognostic value beyond these two biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.