Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762128›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2019

Genetics of anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Part 1: Non-syndromic anophthalmia/microphthalmia.

J Plaisancié, F Ceroni, R Holt, C Zazo Seco, P Calvas, N Chassaing, Nicola K Ragge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The RaDiCo information system for rare disease cohorts.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J PlaisanciéService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
F CeroniFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
R HoltFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
C Zazo SecoINSERM U1056, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
P CalvasService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
N ChassaingService de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Nicola K RaggeFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK. n.ragge@nhs.net.

Funding

French National Research Agency ANR-10-COHO-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye formation is the result of coordinated induction and differentiation processes during embryogenesis. Disruption of any one of these events has the potential to cause ocular growth and structural defects, such as anophthalmia and microphthalmia (A/M). A/M can be isolated or occur with systemic anomalies, when they may form part of a recognizable syndrome. Their etiology includes genetic and environmental factors; several hundred genes involved in ocular development have been identified in humans or animal models. In humans, around 30 genes have been repeatedly implicated in A/M families, although many other genes have been described in single cases or families, and some genetic syndromes include eye anomalies occasionally as part of a wider phenotype. As a result of this broad genetic heterogeneity, with one or two notable exceptions, each gene explains only a small percentage of cases. Given the overlapping phenotypes, these genes can be most efficiently tested on panels or by whole exome/genome sequencing for the purposes of molecular diagnosis. However, despite whole exome/genome testing more than half of patients currently remain without a molecular diagnosis. The proportion of undiagnosed cases is even higher in those individuals with unilateral or milder phenotypes. Furthermore, even when a strong gene candidate is available for a patient, issues of incomplete penetrance and germinal mosaicism make diagnosis and genetic counseling challenging. In this review, we present the main genes implicated in non-syndromic human A/M phenotypes and, for practical purposes, classify them according to the most frequent or predominant phenotype each is associated with. Our intention is that this will allow clinicians to rank and prioritize their molecular analyses and interpretations according to the phenotypes of their patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophthalmosExomeEyeEye AbnormalitiesHumansMicrophthalmosPhenotypeSyndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.