Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30762122›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2019

Diagnostic Imaging of Inflammatory Myopathies: New Concepts and a Radiological Approach.

Júlio Brandão Guimarães, Marcelo A Nico, Alípio G Omond, Laís Uyeda Aivazoglou, Rafael Baches Jorge, Edmar Zanoteli, Artur R C Fernandes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Júlio Brandão GuimarãesDepartment of Radiology, Grupo Osteomuscular, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil. Julio.BrandaoGuimaraes@ucsf.edu.
Marcelo A NicoDepartment of Radiology, Grupo Osteomuscular, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alípio G OmondDepartment of Radiology, Grupo Osteomuscular, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laís Uyeda AivazoglouDepartment of Radiology, Grupo Osteomuscular, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Baches JorgeDepartment of Radiology, Grupo Osteomuscular, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edmar ZanoteliDepartment of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Artur R C FernandesDepartment of Radiology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review article is to highlight the current role of diagnostic imaging in the assessment of inflammatory myopathies. RECENT

findingsRecent research demonstrates that imaging plays an important role in evaluating patients with symptoms of an inflammatory myopathy. In general, MRI is the pivotal imaging modality for assessing inflammatory myopathies, revealing precise anatomic details because of changes in the signal intensity of the muscles. Whole-body MR imaging has become increasingly important over the last several years. US is also a valuable imaging modality for scanning muscles. Together with the clinical history, familiarity with the imaging features of inflammatory myopathies is essential for formulating an accurate diagnosis.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDermatomyositisEdemaEosinophiliaFasciitisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalMyositisMyositis, Inclusion BodyMyotoxicityPolymyositisUltrasonographyWhole Body ImagingInflammatory myopathyMagnetic resonance imagingUltrasoundWhole-body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.