Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761897›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2019

Machine Learning Identifies Chemical Characteristics That Promote Enzyme Catalysis.

Brian M Bonk, James W Weis, Bruce Tidor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LPATH: A Semiautomated Python Tool for Clustering Molecular Pathways.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. LPATH: A semi-automated Python tool for clustering molecular pathways.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Data-driven enzyme engineering to identify function-enhancing enzymes.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2023
    Review
  11. IntEnzyDB: an Integrated Structure-Kinetics Enzymology Database.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Science advances · 2021
    Article
  18. Machine learning for enzyme engineering, selection and design.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian M BonkDepartment of Biological Engineering , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-9067
James W WeisComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3735-0365
Bruce TidorDepartment of Biological Engineering , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3320-3969

Funding

Graduate Training in Computational and Systems BiologyT32GM087237 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BURGE, CHRISTOPHER B · 2009 to 2023
$4.6M
Computational Design of Inhibitor SpecificityR01GM082209 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIDOR, BRUCE · 2009 to 2017
$2.7M
Packing and Electrostatic Effects on Folding and BindingR01GM065418 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIDOR, BRUCE · 2003 to 2012
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065418NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082209NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM087237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite tremendous progress in understanding and engineering enzymes, knowledge of how enzyme structures and their dynamics induce observed catalytic properties is incomplete, and capabilities to engineer enzymes fall far short of industrial needs. Here, we investigate the structural and dynamic drivers of enzyme catalysis for the rate-limiting step of the industrially important enzyme ketol-acid reductoisomerase (KARI) and identify a region of the conformational space of the bound enzyme-substrate complex that, when populated, leads to large increases in reactivity. We apply computational statistical mechanical methods that implement transition interface sampling to simulate the kinetics of the reaction and combine this with machine learning techniques from artificial intelligence to select features relevant to reactivity and to build predictive models for reactive trajectories. We find that conformational descriptors alone, without the need for dynamic ones, are sufficient to predict reactivity with greater than 85% accuracy (90% AUC). Key descriptors distinguishing reactive from almost-reactive trajectories quantify substrate conformation, substrate bond polarization, and metal coordination geometry and suggest their role in promoting substrate reactivity. Moreover, trajectories constrained to visit a region of the reactant well, separated from the rest by a simple hyperplane defined by ten conformational parameters, show increases in computed reactivity by many orders of magnitude. This study provides evidence for the existence of reactivity promoting regions within the conformational space of the enzyme-substrate complex and develops methodology for identifying and validating these particularly reactive regions of phase space. We suggest that identification of reactivity promoting regions and re-engineering enzymes to preferentially populate them may lead to significant rate enhancements.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationBiocatalysisKetol-Acid ReductoisomeraseMonte Carlo MethodProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityKetol-Acid Reductoisomerase

Identifiers

PMID30761897
PMCPMC6407039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.