Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761852›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2019

Evaluation of measles immunity in Turkey: is it still a threat?

Selda Karaayvaz, Melahat Melek Oğuz, Ufuk Beyazova, Gülay Korukluoğlu, Yasemin Coşgun, Zeliha Güzelküçük, Nur Baran Aksakal, Figen Şahin Dağlı

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melahat Melek OğuzORCID 0000-0002-4196-4469
Ufuk Beyazova
Gülay KorukluoğluORCID 0000-0001-7625-6350
Zeliha GüzelküçükORCID 0000-0003-1462-6867
Nur Baran AksakalORCID 0000-0002-8624-3307
Figen Şahin DağlıORCID 0000-0002-6678-9791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Measles is one of the important vaccine-preventable diseases with many complications in childhood. This study presents cross-sectional seroepidemiological data, beginning from neonatal cord blood in infants to children under 6 years of age, about waning of measles antibody and tries to suggest the proper time for measles immunization. Materials and methods: A total of 564 blood samples consisting of neonatal cord blood and samples taken from infants and children at ages of 6, 9, 24–48, and 49–72 months were analyzed for measles seropositivity in a period of 6 months. Results: Measles seropositivity rate was 72.5% in 109 cord blood samples, 2.6% in 117 infants of 6 months of age, and 3.6% in 111 infants of 9 months of age. Seropositivity was determined in 118 children at 24–48 months and in 109 children at 49–72 months and was 80.5% and 66%, respectively (P = 0.001). These children were vaccinated in the 12th month. Conclusion: Though measles immunization coverage is 97% in Turkey, population immunity is somewhat lower than expected. Increases of measles cases in Europe and the refugee problem in the country could easily lead to outbreaks. Implementing the first dose of the immunization at 9 months may be an option.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFetal BloodHumansImmunizationInfantMaleMeaslesMeasles VaccineSeroepidemiologic StudiesTurkeyAntibodies, ViralMeasles VaccineChildhood immunizationmeaslesmeasles eliminationmeasles epidemiologymeasles immunization

Identifiers

PMID30761852
PMCPMC7350803
OpenAlexW2911843794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.